Jerry Stuckle?

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.

But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.

We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================

atec77

2014-07-21 21:50:09 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.
But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.
We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"

oxymoron ?

--
X-No-Archive: Yes

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-21 21:55:39 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.
But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.
We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"
oxymoron ?

No - it means "lack of intelligence" - i.e. someone dumber than a doorknob.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
***@attglobal.net
==================

atec77

2014-07-22 00:20:01 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.
But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.
We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"
oxymoron ?

No - it means "lack of intelligence" - i.e. someone dumber than a doorknob.

hence you not understanding oxymoron , your deprivation and mental state

--
X-No-Archive: Yes

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 00:48:46 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.
But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.
We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"
oxymoron ?

No - it means "lack of intelligence" - i.e. someone dumber than a doorknob.

hence you not understanding oxymoron , your deprivation and mental state

Oh, I understand oxymoron. But obviously YOU don't. "Intellectual
idiot" is not an oxymoron. "Military Intelligence" is.

Now who has the "deprivation and mental state"? Looks like a troll with
a false 'nym, an invalid email address and no call sign.

IOW, a troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================

atec77

2014-07-22 00:57:28 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.
But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.
We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"
oxymoron ?

No - it means "lack of intelligence" - i.e. someone dumber than a doorknob.

hence you not understanding oxymoron , your deprivation and mental state

Oh, I understand

nah you don't
now would you like a little cheese with that whine and whoosh ?

oxymoron. But obviously YOU don't. "Intellectual

Post by Jerry Stuckle
idiot" is not an oxymoron. "Military Intelligence" is.
Now who has the "deprivation and mental state"? Looks like a troll with
a false 'nym, an invalid email address and no call sign.
IOW, a troll.

--
X-No-Archive: Yes

Jack the Postman

2014-07-21 21:14:30 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

I'll bet he's never been arrested for attacking a postman. Unlike Gareth
G4SDW

gareth

2014-07-21 22:28:11 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 00:08:33 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".

ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.

If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!

Now go on back and play with your Legos.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
***@attglobal.net
==================

gareth

2014-07-22 06:04:35 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".

ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 12:16:25 UTC

Post by gareth
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".

ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.

Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
***@attglobal.net
==================

gareth

2014-07-22 14:08:44 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 14:32:13 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).

Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================

gareth

2014-07-22 14:44:50 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 17:07:29 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.
You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.
Shame on you.

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.

Really - you are just TOO EASY.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================

gareth

2014-07-22 17:49:09 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.

rickman

2014-07-22 17:57:13 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.
You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.
Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.

--
Rick

gareth

2014-07-22 18:01:54 UTC

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like mirror
images of one another.

On the contrary, Stuckle and you have one thing in common, and that is
that you both resort to offensive personal remarks.

I am merely chastising the pair of you for your childish behaviours.

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 18:30:57 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.
You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.
Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.

Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================

rickman

2014-07-22 22:42:47 UTC

Post by Jerry Stuckle
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.

It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.
You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.
Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.

Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)
Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!

Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded person.

--
Rick

Jerry Stuckle

2014-07-22 23:57:42 UTC