Discussion:
High brightness LEDs?
(too old to reply)
gareth
2014-11-28 13:20:10 UTC
Permalink
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
Scott Dorsey
2014-11-28 13:50:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
You might find a little constant current supply, but my guess is that
you'd just find a big dropping resistor. That configuration would
result in most of the power being wasted as heat, but it would still
produce less heat than an incandescent and be brighter.

If you want a high voltage regulator, a TIP50 transistor and a high
voltage zener (or a string of low voltage zeners) will fix you right
up. The TIP50 is comparatively easy to damage, but if you don't hook
it up backwards or something it will be very, very reliable. Not
expensive.

Think of the TIP50 as a 5080 replacement with a lot more gain and
better transconductance in the bargain.

If you want a high voltage switcher, on the other hand, look at the
Linear Technology chips intended for LCD backlight inverters. There
are some great Jim Williams applications notes.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-28 14:30:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Dorsey
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
You might find a little constant current supply, but my guess is that
you'd just find a big dropping resistor. That configuration would
result in most of the power being wasted as heat, but it would still
produce less heat than an incandescent and be brighter.
If you want a high voltage regulator, a TIP50 transistor and a high
voltage zener (or a string of low voltage zeners) will fix you right
up. The TIP50 is comparatively easy to damage, but if you don't hook
it up backwards or something it will be very, very reliable. Not
expensive.
Think of the TIP50 as a 5080 replacement with a lot more gain and
better transconductance in the bargain.
If you want a high voltage switcher, on the other hand, look at the
Linear Technology chips intended for LCD backlight inverters. There
are some great Jim Williams applications notes.
--scott
No, these have electronic power supplies in them. Otherwise they would
dissipate huge amounts of heat. Think about it. LED's run at about 3V.
That means a 9W LED requires about 3 amps of power. 3 amps at 240V is
720W - or about 711W of power wasted. They would be way less efficient
than any other type of bulbs. Plus LED's run on DC and would not work
as efficiently on 50Hz AC.

However, they also are generally pretty well potted and almost
impossible to take apart without destroying them. And even if you could
get one apart, its design is single-purpose and generally won't do well
in a different application.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Scott Dorsey
2014-11-29 04:11:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, these have electronic power supplies in them. Otherwise they would
dissipate huge amounts of heat. Think about it. LED's run at about 3V.
That means a 9W LED requires about 3 amps of power. 3 amps at 240V is
720W - or about 711W of power wasted. They would be way less efficient
than any other type of bulbs. Plus LED's run on DC and would not work
as efficiently on 50Hz AC.
9W is an enormous amount of power for an LED. The LEDs used to replace
pilot lamps are normally running 10mA, not 3 amps. This is what allows
a dropping resistor to be used.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 04:31:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Dorsey
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, these have electronic power supplies in them. Otherwise they would
dissipate huge amounts of heat. Think about it. LED's run at about 3V.
That means a 9W LED requires about 3 amps of power. 3 amps at 240V is
720W - or about 711W of power wasted. They would be way less efficient
than any other type of bulbs. Plus LED's run on DC and would not work
as efficiently on 50Hz AC.
9W is an enormous amount of power for an LED. The LEDs used to replace
pilot lamps are normally running 10mA, not 3 amps. This is what allows
a dropping resistor to be used.
--scott
You are confusing LEDs with LED bulbs. A 9W LED bulb is equivalent to
about a 60W incandescent bulb.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Scott Dorsey
2014-11-30 05:36:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Scott Dorsey
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, these have electronic power supplies in them. Otherwise they would
dissipate huge amounts of heat. Think about it. LED's run at about 3V.
That means a 9W LED requires about 3 amps of power. 3 amps at 240V is
720W - or about 711W of power wasted. They would be way less efficient
than any other type of bulbs. Plus LED's run on DC and would not work
as efficiently on 50Hz AC.
9W is an enormous amount of power for an LED. The LEDs used to replace
pilot lamps are normally running 10mA, not 3 amps. This is what allows
a dropping resistor to be used.
You are confusing LEDs with LED bulbs. A 9W LED bulb is equivalent to
about a 60W incandescent bulb.
Ahh, I thought you were talking about the high intensity LED replacements
for incandescent pilot lamps. Not the household bulb replacements. The
house lamp replacements have switchers in them.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Jim Mueller
2014-11-28 22:30:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Dorsey
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to open them,
would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for some of our valve
experiments and repairs?
You might find a little constant current supply, but my guess is that
you'd just find a big dropping resistor. That configuration would
result in most of the power being wasted as heat, but it would still
produce less heat than an incandescent and be brighter.
If you want a high voltage regulator, a TIP50 transistor and a high
voltage zener (or a string of low voltage zeners) will fix you right up.
The TIP50 is comparatively easy to damage, but if you don't hook it up
backwards or something it will be very, very reliable. Not expensive.
Think of the TIP50 as a 5080 replacement with a lot more gain and better
transconductance in the bargain.
If you want a high voltage switcher, on the other hand, look at the
Linear Technology chips intended for LCD backlight inverters. There are
some great Jim Williams applications notes.
--scott
The regulators in LED lamps are constant current types, not constant
voltage. They also have some sort of step-down circuit because the LED
needs a lot more current than what you would want to draw from the AC
lines. Common power LED currents are in the neighborhood of 350 and 700
mA.

Some very small LED lamps, Christmas light size, use capacitors to limit
the current.

Jim Mueller
--
Jim Mueller ***@nospam.com

To get my real email address, replace wrongname with dadoheadman.
Then replace nospam with fastmail. Lastly, replace com with us.
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-28 18:17:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.

How many 3 volt valves can you name?
--
Jim Pennino
Michael Black
2014-11-28 20:00:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.

A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.

Of course, one can run tubes on low voltage. The Collins 75S receiver
line apparently kept plat voltage relatively low (somewhere around 120v if
I remember right) which had certain advantages. One can run regular tubes
at 12VDC on the plate, there were some articles in Popular Electronics
about this, calling them "starved circuits". Or there were those tubes
designed to run off 12VDC for those hybrid car radios, a last gasp before
transistors took over completely.

Though, 3VDC does seem a tad low.

Michael
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-28 21:11:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Post by Michael Black
Of course, one can run tubes on low voltage. The Collins 75S receiver
line apparently kept plat voltage relatively low (somewhere around 120v if
I remember right) which had certain advantages. One can run regular tubes
at 12VDC on the plate, there were some articles in Popular Electronics
about this, calling them "starved circuits". Or there were those tubes
designed to run off 12VDC for those hybrid car radios, a last gasp before
transistors took over completely.
Though, 3VDC does seem a tad low.
When they were running regular tubes on "low voltage", that was voltages
around 100 V as opposed to 200 to 300 Volts.

The 12 Volt tubes are long gone and not that great to begin with.
Post by Michael Black
Michael
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-28 21:35:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?

<snip>
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-28 22:24:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?

To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.

And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.

However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-28 23:16:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.

You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 00:05:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.

Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.

Try reading a little...

http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
--
Rick
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 00:37:18 UTC
Permalink
<snip>
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
No, I am NOT speculating on anything.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Yes, it is correct as it means that the average voltage is changed.

Incandescent bulbs are thermal devices and the light ouput is directly
proportional to the average applied voltage and don't care if the
applied voltage is DC, a sine wave, or pulses derived from a sine wave.

And dimmers do NOT work by changing the phase angle, they work by
changing a thyristor phase control.

See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyristor#Applications
--
Jim Pennino
rickman
2014-11-29 01:03:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
No, I am NOT speculating on anything.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Yes, it is correct as it means that the average voltage is changed.
Incandescent bulbs are thermal devices and the light ouput is directly
proportional to the average applied voltage and don't care if the
applied voltage is DC, a sine wave, or pulses derived from a sine wave.
And dimmers do NOT work by changing the phase angle, they work by
changing a thyristor phase control.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyristor#Applications
Please be as pedantic as you like. You are wrong.

The very article you reference shows that the dimmer works by
controlling the phase angle over which the AC voltage is passed to the
load. There are *many* LED bulbs which can be dimmed by this standard
type of dimmer. As the reference I provide shows, these bulbs include
smarts to measure this phase angle and adjust the bulb brightness
accordingly. I have several in my home.
--
Rick
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 01:31:42 UTC
Permalink
<snip>
Post by rickman
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyristor#Applications
Please be as pedantic as you like. You are wrong.
No, I am not, and I am being precise in my language.
Post by rickman
The very article you reference shows that the dimmer works by
controlling the phase angle over which the AC voltage is passed to the
load.
Which is the phase angle, or more properly, the conduction angle of the
contolling device, not the phase angle of the AC source.

If the voltage is turned off for part of the conduction cycle, the
average voltage changes.

This is Electronics 101.
Post by rickman
There are *many* LED bulbs which can be dimmed by this standard
type of dimmer.
Yes, there are, but that is irrelevant to how a dimmer works and only
relevant to how the bulb works.
Post by rickman
As the reference I provide shows,
What reference?
Post by rickman
these bulbs include
smarts to measure this phase angle
You mean conduction angle?

You can't measure a phase angle absent a reference signal of a known
phase.

Again, Electronic 101.
Post by rickman
and adjust the bulb brightness
accordingly. I have several in my home.
Whoopee!!
--
Jim Pennino
rickman
2014-11-29 03:37:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by rickman
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyristor#Applications
Please be as pedantic as you like. You are wrong.
No, I am not, and I am being precise in my language.
Post by rickman
The very article you reference shows that the dimmer works by
controlling the phase angle over which the AC voltage is passed to the
load.
Which is the phase angle, or more properly, the conduction angle of the
contolling device, not the phase angle of the AC source.
If the voltage is turned off for part of the conduction cycle, the
average voltage changes.
This is Electronics 101.
Post by rickman
There are *many* LED bulbs which can be dimmed by this standard
type of dimmer.
Yes, there are, but that is irrelevant to how a dimmer works and only
relevant to how the bulb works.
Post by rickman
As the reference I provide shows,
What reference?
Post by rickman
these bulbs include
smarts to measure this phase angle
You mean conduction angle?
You can't measure a phase angle absent a reference signal of a known
phase.
Again, Electronic 101.
Post by rickman
and adjust the bulb brightness
accordingly. I have several in my home.
Whoopee!!
Ok, if you really want to discuss this let me know.
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 01:52:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".

There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 03:39:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Really? So the standard dimmers in my home can't work with the dimmable
LED bulbs they are connected to and seem to control just fine?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".
There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
How do you explain the several LED bulbs I have working on standard
dimmers in my home?
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 04:01:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Really? So the standard dimmers in my home can't work with the dimmable
LED bulbs they are connected to and seem to control just fine?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".
There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
How do you explain the several LED bulbs I have working on standard
dimmers in my home?
Rick,

How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?

But since you want the details, here is a start. There are a number of
problems with standard incandescent dimmers. Since they cut off the
initial phase of the positive and negative phases, when they start
conducting there is a large surge of power. This surge causes
additional heat buildup in a switching power supply and can cause
premature failure of the bulb and/or dimmer.

If you look at travel adapters for running U.S. devices on European
voltages, you'll find two different types - electronic switching and
standard transformer. You will notice the electronic switching supplies
are higher powered have cautions not to use them with electronic loads
such as radios and TV's. This is for the same reason as dimmers on LEDs
- the dimmer does not put out a clean waveform.

Transformer-based travel adapters have no such limitation because they
put out a clean signal, but have lower power ratings.

There are other problems, also. Conventional dimmers having a minimum
load (minimum current flowing through triacs). If the minimum load to
maintain conduction is 10W, a 15W LED will only dim to 2/3 power before
turning off.

Dimmable LED bulbs are also very sensitive to voltage fluctuations, and
can flicker with variations in the line voltage. This is especially
true when operating near that cutoff voltage noted above.

Also, since LED's respond immediately to current changes (unlike
incandescent, which have a high thermal inertia), there is a tendency
for them to flicker when the wrong dimmer is used. Sure, it's 120 hz
flicker - but some people are sensitive to it and can suffer headaches.
Worst case, but fortunately very rare, the flash can cause epileptic
seizures those sensitive to it.

These are some of the most serious problems with using conventional
dimmers with LED bulbs. It's also why manufacturers spend a lot of
money developing special dimmers for LED bulbs.

I would also recommend you check other manufacturer's of LED bulb
dimmers. You will find they all have the same cautions. But since
these pages are intended for consumers, they obviously leave out the
technical details. Those are available to dealers, though, either
through dealer-only pages or dealer support.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 04:16:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Really? So the standard dimmers in my home can't work with the dimmable
LED bulbs they are connected to and seem to control just fine?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".
There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
How do you explain the several LED bulbs I have working on standard
dimmers in my home?
Rick,
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
I don't see where they said that. They are only talking about their own
products.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
But since you want the details, here is a start. There are a number of
problems with standard incandescent dimmers. Since they cut off the
initial phase of the positive and negative phases, when they start
conducting there is a large surge of power. This surge causes
additional heat buildup in a switching power supply and can cause
premature failure of the bulb and/or dimmer.
Dealing with this heat would be part of the design requirements for a
"dimmable" LED bulb, no?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you look at travel adapters for running U.S. devices on European
voltages, you'll find two different types - electronic switching and
standard transformer. You will notice the electronic switching supplies
are higher powered have cautions not to use them with electronic loads
such as radios and TV's. This is for the same reason as dimmers on LEDs
- the dimmer does not put out a clean waveform.
Transformer-based travel adapters have no such limitation because they
put out a clean signal, but have lower power ratings.
There are other problems, also. Conventional dimmers having a minimum
load (minimum current flowing through triacs). If the minimum load to
maintain conduction is 10W, a 15W LED will only dim to 2/3 power before
turning off.
Dimmable LED bulbs are also very sensitive to voltage fluctuations, and
can flicker with variations in the line voltage. This is especially
true when operating near that cutoff voltage noted above.
Again, this is a design issue and one that is present even when not
being dimmed.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Also, since LED's respond immediately to current changes (unlike
incandescent, which have a high thermal inertia), there is a tendency
for them to flicker when the wrong dimmer is used. Sure, it's 120 hz
flicker - but some people are sensitive to it and can suffer headaches.
Worst case, but fortunately very rare, the flash can cause epileptic
seizures those sensitive to it.
I have seen no information that 120 Hz flicker is in any way noticeable
or that anyone is sensitive to it. Monitors have flickered at much
lower rates for a very long time. Plus... again, this is an issue
without dimmers.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
These are some of the most serious problems with using conventional
dimmers with LED bulbs. It's also why manufacturers spend a lot of
money developing special dimmers for LED bulbs.
I would also recommend you check other manufacturer's of LED bulb
dimmers. You will find they all have the same cautions. But since
these pages are intended for consumers, they obviously leave out the
technical details. Those are available to dealers, though, either
through dealer-only pages or dealer support.
And yet, I have dimmers that work...
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 04:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to
remove,
and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The
probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from
some
very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing
else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Really? So the standard dimmers in my home can't work with the dimmable
LED bulbs they are connected to and seem to control just fine?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".
There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
How do you explain the several LED bulbs I have working on standard
dimmers in my home?
Rick,
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
I don't see where they said that. They are only talking about their own
products.
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."

That seems to indicate they won't work reliably.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
But since you want the details, here is a start. There are a number of
problems with standard incandescent dimmers. Since they cut off the
initial phase of the positive and negative phases, when they start
conducting there is a large surge of power. This surge causes
additional heat buildup in a switching power supply and can cause
premature failure of the bulb and/or dimmer.
Dealing with this heat would be part of the design requirements for a
"dimmable" LED bulb, no?
Not when used with a non-LED bulb dimmer.

Simple LED dimmers use MOSFETs to trim the trailing part of the
waveform, eliminating the surge.

You can argue design all you want. But the fact is this surge current
creates heat - which wastes energy, making the bulb less efficient. And
adding what is necessary to handle the extra current would add cost,
raising the price. Both make the product less competitive.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you look at travel adapters for running U.S. devices on European
voltages, you'll find two different types - electronic switching and
standard transformer. You will notice the electronic switching supplies
are higher powered have cautions not to use them with electronic loads
such as radios and TV's. This is for the same reason as dimmers on LEDs
- the dimmer does not put out a clean waveform.
Transformer-based travel adapters have no such limitation because they
put out a clean signal, but have lower power ratings.
There are other problems, also. Conventional dimmers having a minimum
load (minimum current flowing through triacs). If the minimum load to
maintain conduction is 10W, a 15W LED will only dim to 2/3 power before
turning off.
Dimmable LED bulbs are also very sensitive to voltage fluctuations, and
can flicker with variations in the line voltage. This is especially
true when operating near that cutoff voltage noted above.
Again, this is a design issue and one that is present even when not
being dimmed.
No, they do not flicker at full power. They may dim a bit, but they
will not flicker. LED dimmers provide a stable voltage to the bulb,
eliminating flicker.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Also, since LED's respond immediately to current changes (unlike
incandescent, which have a high thermal inertia), there is a tendency
for them to flicker when the wrong dimmer is used. Sure, it's 120 hz
flicker - but some people are sensitive to it and can suffer headaches.
Worst case, but fortunately very rare, the flash can cause epileptic
seizures those sensitive to it.
I have seen no information that 120 Hz flicker is in any way noticeable
or that anyone is sensitive to it. Monitors have flickered at much
lower rates for a very long time. Plus... again, this is an issue
without dimmers.
You haven't been reading the medical engineering data. It is not so
much an issue without dimmers because there is a slight inertial effect
in the switching supply (capacitors) such that the bulb doesn't dim to
0, even at zero crossing. However, when you start cutting the AC cycle
going to the bulb, the capacitors totally discharge and you get a
relatively long period when the LEDs are completely black.

Monitors are not a problem because they work completely differently.
First of all, the original CRTs had a phosphor, which had a certain
amount of persistence. Newer LCD monitors (even "LED" monitors are LCD
monitors, just with an LED backlight) do not turn pixels on and off at a
scan rate.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
These are some of the most serious problems with using conventional
dimmers with LED bulbs. It's also why manufacturers spend a lot of
money developing special dimmers for LED bulbs.
I would also recommend you check other manufacturer's of LED bulb
dimmers. You will find they all have the same cautions. But since
these pages are intended for consumers, they obviously leave out the
technical details. Those are available to dealers, though, either
through dealer-only pages or dealer support.
And yet, I have dimmers that work...
See above - and check other manufactures of LED dimmers, also. They all
say the same thing. Argue with them, not me.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 05:02:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to
remove,
and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The
probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from
some
very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could
use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing
else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Really? So the standard dimmers in my home can't work with the dimmable
LED bulbs they are connected to and seem to control just fine?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".
There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
How do you explain the several LED bulbs I have working on standard
dimmers in my home?
Rick,
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
I don't see where they said that. They are only talking about their own
products.
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
That seems to indicate they won't work reliably.
And yet I have units in my home that work...reliably. Rather than cite
dimmer companies, why not cite the bulb companies? That is what we are
discussing.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
But since you want the details, here is a start. There are a number of
problems with standard incandescent dimmers. Since they cut off the
initial phase of the positive and negative phases, when they start
conducting there is a large surge of power. This surge causes
additional heat buildup in a switching power supply and can cause
premature failure of the bulb and/or dimmer.
Dealing with this heat would be part of the design requirements for a
"dimmable" LED bulb, no?
Not when used with a non-LED bulb dimmer.
Simple LED dimmers use MOSFETs to trim the trailing part of the
waveform, eliminating the surge.
You can argue design all you want. But the fact is this surge current
creates heat - which wastes energy, making the bulb less efficient. And
adding what is necessary to handle the extra current would add cost,
raising the price. Both make the product less competitive.
I never said anything about "wasted" energy or competitiveness. I said
LED bulbs can are are designed that work with existing dimmers.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you look at travel adapters for running U.S. devices on European
voltages, you'll find two different types - electronic switching and
standard transformer. You will notice the electronic switching supplies
are higher powered have cautions not to use them with electronic loads
such as radios and TV's. This is for the same reason as dimmers on LEDs
- the dimmer does not put out a clean waveform.
Transformer-based travel adapters have no such limitation because they
put out a clean signal, but have lower power ratings.
There are other problems, also. Conventional dimmers having a minimum
load (minimum current flowing through triacs). If the minimum load to
maintain conduction is 10W, a 15W LED will only dim to 2/3 power before
turning off.
Dimmable LED bulbs are also very sensitive to voltage fluctuations, and
can flicker with variations in the line voltage. This is especially
true when operating near that cutoff voltage noted above.
Again, this is a design issue and one that is present even when not
being dimmed.
No, they do not flicker at full power. They may dim a bit, but they
will not flicker. LED dimmers provide a stable voltage to the bulb,
eliminating flicker.
There is nothing inherent in a phase angle dimmer that causes flickering
in a properly designed bulb. A few uF capacitance takes care of that.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Also, since LED's respond immediately to current changes (unlike
incandescent, which have a high thermal inertia), there is a tendency
for them to flicker when the wrong dimmer is used. Sure, it's 120 hz
flicker - but some people are sensitive to it and can suffer headaches.
Worst case, but fortunately very rare, the flash can cause epileptic
seizures those sensitive to it.
I have seen no information that 120 Hz flicker is in any way noticeable
or that anyone is sensitive to it. Monitors have flickered at much
lower rates for a very long time. Plus... again, this is an issue
without dimmers.
You haven't been reading the medical engineering data. It is not so
much an issue without dimmers because there is a slight inertial effect
in the switching supply (capacitors) such that the bulb doesn't dim to
0, even at zero crossing. However, when you start cutting the AC cycle
going to the bulb, the capacitors totally discharge and you get a
relatively long period when the LEDs are completely black.
Unless you add a bit more capacitance... again a bulb design issue.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Monitors are not a problem because they work completely differently.
First of all, the original CRTs had a phosphor, which had a certain
amount of persistence. Newer LCD monitors (even "LED" monitors are LCD
monitors, just with an LED backlight) do not turn pixels on and off at a
scan rate.
Lol. Monitors do flicker and have always flickered. At 60 Hz most
monitors bother me a lot. At 80 Hz not at all. I don't know anyone or
have read anything that says 120 Hz is not sufficient to preclude the
perception of flicker.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
These are some of the most serious problems with using conventional
dimmers with LED bulbs. It's also why manufacturers spend a lot of
money developing special dimmers for LED bulbs.
I would also recommend you check other manufacturer's of LED bulb
dimmers. You will find they all have the same cautions. But since
these pages are intended for consumers, they obviously leave out the
technical details. Those are available to dealers, though, either
through dealer-only pages or dealer support.
And yet, I have dimmers that work...
See above - and check other manufactures of LED dimmers, also. They all
say the same thing. Argue with them, not me.
Ok, I guess we are done then.
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:12:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to
remove,
and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The
probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from
some
very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could
use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by
changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is
proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing
else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation
issues
aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without
some
kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Sorry, but lighting control has been my job for much of the last 11
years. I am considered an expert in it by many of my peers and teach
courses on it. We also install many different lighting systems,
including LED.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Which they aren't for many reasons that I won't get into here.
Really? So the standard dimmers in my home can't work with the dimmable
LED bulbs they are connected to and seem to control just fine?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
This article is sorely lacking in facts. Notice the title: "LED
lighting must work with legacy dimming technologies".
There are a number of problems with dimmable LED bulbs and the standard
triac dimmer. See above. And I suggest you read more reliable
information. LED bulb manufacturer's information is a better start.
How do you explain the several LED bulbs I have working on standard
dimmers in my home?
Rick,
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
I don't see where they said that. They are only talking about their own
products.
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
That seems to indicate they won't work reliably.
And yet I have units in my home that work...reliably. Rather than cite
dimmer companies, why not cite the bulb companies? That is what we are
discussing.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
But since you want the details, here is a start. There are a number of
problems with standard incandescent dimmers. Since they cut off the
initial phase of the positive and negative phases, when they start
conducting there is a large surge of power. This surge causes
additional heat buildup in a switching power supply and can cause
premature failure of the bulb and/or dimmer.
Dealing with this heat would be part of the design requirements for a
"dimmable" LED bulb, no?
Not when used with a non-LED bulb dimmer.
Simple LED dimmers use MOSFETs to trim the trailing part of the
waveform, eliminating the surge.
You can argue design all you want. But the fact is this surge current
creates heat - which wastes energy, making the bulb less efficient. And
adding what is necessary to handle the extra current would add cost,
raising the price. Both make the product less competitive.
I never said anything about "wasted" energy or competitiveness. I said
LED bulbs can are are designed that work with existing dimmers.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you look at travel adapters for running U.S. devices on European
voltages, you'll find two different types - electronic switching and
standard transformer. You will notice the electronic switching supplies
are higher powered have cautions not to use them with electronic loads
such as radios and TV's. This is for the same reason as dimmers on LEDs
- the dimmer does not put out a clean waveform.
Transformer-based travel adapters have no such limitation because they
put out a clean signal, but have lower power ratings.
There are other problems, also. Conventional dimmers having a minimum
load (minimum current flowing through triacs). If the minimum load to
maintain conduction is 10W, a 15W LED will only dim to 2/3 power before
turning off.
Dimmable LED bulbs are also very sensitive to voltage fluctuations, and
can flicker with variations in the line voltage. This is especially
true when operating near that cutoff voltage noted above.
Again, this is a design issue and one that is present even when not
being dimmed.
No, they do not flicker at full power. They may dim a bit, but they
will not flicker. LED dimmers provide a stable voltage to the bulb,
eliminating flicker.
There is nothing inherent in a phase angle dimmer that causes flickering
in a properly designed bulb. A few uF capacitance takes care of that.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Also, since LED's respond immediately to current changes (unlike
incandescent, which have a high thermal inertia), there is a tendency
for them to flicker when the wrong dimmer is used. Sure, it's 120 hz
flicker - but some people are sensitive to it and can suffer headaches.
Worst case, but fortunately very rare, the flash can cause epileptic
seizures those sensitive to it.
I have seen no information that 120 Hz flicker is in any way noticeable
or that anyone is sensitive to it. Monitors have flickered at much
lower rates for a very long time. Plus... again, this is an issue
without dimmers.
You haven't been reading the medical engineering data. It is not so
much an issue without dimmers because there is a slight inertial effect
in the switching supply (capacitors) such that the bulb doesn't dim to
0, even at zero crossing. However, when you start cutting the AC cycle
going to the bulb, the capacitors totally discharge and you get a
relatively long period when the LEDs are completely black.
Unless you add a bit more capacitance... again a bulb design issue.
Which the non-dimmable bulbs have.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Monitors are not a problem because they work completely differently.
First of all, the original CRTs had a phosphor, which had a certain
amount of persistence. Newer LCD monitors (even "LED" monitors are LCD
monitors, just with an LED backlight) do not turn pixels on and off at a
scan rate.
Lol. Monitors do flicker and have always flickered. At 60 Hz most
monitors bother me a lot. At 80 Hz not at all. I don't know anyone or
have read anything that says 120 Hz is not sufficient to preclude the
perception of flicker.
Yes, CRTs flicker. They do not go out all together. And there is
significant medical evidence that some people are susceptible to the
on/off flicker at at 120 Hz. That's why companies have come out with
phase width dimmers which operate at higher frequencies, such as 480 hz.

If there weren't a need and a market for them, the manufacturers
wouldn't spend the time and money developing the product.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
These are some of the most serious problems with using conventional
dimmers with LED bulbs. It's also why manufacturers spend a lot of
money developing special dimmers for LED bulbs.
I would also recommend you check other manufacturer's of LED bulb
dimmers. You will find they all have the same cautions. But since
these pages are intended for consumers, they obviously leave out the
technical details. Those are available to dealers, though, either
through dealer-only pages or dealer support.
And yet, I have dimmers that work...
See above - and check other manufactures of LED dimmers, also. They all
say the same thing. Argue with them, not me.
Ok, I guess we are done then.
I suggest you check your facts. And get your information from reliable
resources.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 06:09:54 UTC
Permalink
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle <***@attglobal.net> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.

http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/

<snip remainder>
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:14:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?

I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Rob
2014-11-29 15:14:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Of course you won't believe it, but Philips (one l, a Dutch company)
know how to design lighting systems.
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:23:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Of course you won't believe it, but Philips (one l, a Dutch company)
know how to design lighting systems.
I never said they didn't. But that doesn't mean their LED bulbs work
with legacy dimmers.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 17:56:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Of course you won't believe it, but Philips (one l, a Dutch company)
know how to design lighting systems.
I never said they didn't. But that doesn't mean their LED bulbs work
with legacy dimmers.
Independant reviews by people not selling someone else's product like
you are say they do.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 01:16:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Of course you won't believe it, but Philips (one l, a Dutch company)
know how to design lighting systems.
I never said they didn't. But that doesn't mean their LED bulbs work
with legacy dimmers.
Independant reviews by people not selling someone else's product like
you are say they do.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.

Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 17:55:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Yes, you will believe the engineers from the company whose bulbs and
dimmers you sell; you kind of have to.

There are lots of INDEPENDANT reviews out there that do NOT hold the
same views you do.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 01:17:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Yes, you will believe the engineers from the company whose bulbs and
dimmers you sell; you kind of have to.
No, I don't. I believe them because they are correct. If I didn't
believe them, we wouldn't sell their product.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
There are lots of INDEPENDANT reviews out there that do NOT hold the
same views you do.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.

Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 03:16:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Yes, you will believe the engineers from the company whose bulbs and
dimmers you sell; you kind of have to.
No, I don't. I believe them because they are correct. If I didn't
believe them, we wouldn't sell their product.
Oh course you wouldn't.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
There are lots of INDEPENDANT reviews out there that do NOT hold the
same views you do.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.
And of course anyone that disgrees with you is untrained.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
And of course any independant reviewer that disagrees with you is the
"funny pages".
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 03:33:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Yes, you will believe the engineers from the company whose bulbs and
dimmers you sell; you kind of have to.
No, I don't. I believe them because they are correct. If I didn't
believe them, we wouldn't sell their product.
Oh course you wouldn't.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
There are lots of INDEPENDANT reviews out there that do NOT hold the
same views you do.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.
And of course anyone that disgrees with you is untrained.
And what are the qualifications of the guy who wrote the blog? A
"text-based adventure connoisseur"? Some qualifications! Where's his
engineering degree? His experience in test labs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
And of course any independant reviewer that disagrees with you is the
"funny pages".
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 06:00:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Yes, you will believe the engineers from the company whose bulbs and
dimmers you sell; you kind of have to.
No, I don't. I believe them because they are correct. If I didn't
believe them, we wouldn't sell their product.
Oh course you wouldn't.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
There are lots of INDEPENDANT reviews out there that do NOT hold the
same views you do.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.
And of course anyone that disgrees with you is untrained.
And what are the qualifications of the guy who wrote the blog? A
"text-based adventure connoisseur"? Some qualifications! Where's his
engineering degree? His experience in test labs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
And of course any independant reviewer that disagrees with you is the
"funny pages".
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
My god you are the poster boy for megalomania.
--
Jim Pennino
atec77
2014-11-30 09:15:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
And of course any independant reviewer that disagrees with you is the
"funny pages".
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
My god you are the poster boy for megalomania.
in this part of the world he would be described as a wanker , seems to
fit rather well
why wanker ?
well goal post moving and constant rebuttal of the truth with
fallacious claims tend to suggest wanker is on the money
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 15:18:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by atec77
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
And of course any independant reviewer that disagrees with you is the
"funny pages".
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
My god you are the poster boy for megalomania.
in this part of the world he would be described as a wanker , seems to
fit rather well
why wanker ?
well goal post moving and constant rebuttal of the truth with
fallacious claims tend to suggest wanker is on the money
Ah, another well-known troll has to make a fool of himself. Why don't
you go back to aus.pay.tv? How about aus.legal? Maybe aus.hi-fi? Or
aus.radio.amateur.misc? You're well known as a troll there, also.

Are you trying to set a record for the number of groups you troll?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 15:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
"No, unlike incandescent bulbs that work with almost any dimmer, LED and
CFL bulbs perform differently depending on the dimmer you install. You
will need to select a dimmer designed specifically for dimmable LED/CFL
bulbs."
Not if you use Phillips bulbs.
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
Yes, you will believe the engineers from the company whose bulbs and
dimmers you sell; you kind of have to.
No, I don't. I believe them because they are correct. If I didn't
believe them, we wouldn't sell their product.
Oh course you wouldn't.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
There are lots of INDEPENDANT reviews out there that do NOT hold the
same views you do.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.
And of course anyone that disgrees with you is untrained.
And what are the qualifications of the guy who wrote the blog? A
"text-based adventure connoisseur"? Some qualifications! Where's his
engineering degree? His experience in test labs?
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
And of course any independant reviewer that disagrees with you is the
"funny pages".
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
My god you are the poster boy for megalomania.
ROFLMAO!

Show me a QUALIFIED reviewer, not someone who is a "text-based adventure
connoisseur". But you can't, because there isn't one who agrees with
your delusions.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 18:22:26 UTC
Permalink
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
My god you are the poster boy for megalomania.
ROFLMAO!
Show me a QUALIFIED reviewer, not someone who is a "text-based adventure
connoisseur". But you can't, because there isn't one who agrees with
your delusions.
One does not need to know how to design something to test something,
you megalomaniac.

I could waste my time finding lots of independant reports by lots of
independant sources but since they woud disagree with what the Great
and Mighty Jerry Stuckle, Fountain of all Knowledge that is True and
seller of light bulbs, you would just call them funny papers and the
writers incompetant.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 19:53:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Any UNQUALIFIED reviewer is in the funny pages. And they are right at
your speed.
My god you are the poster boy for megalomania.
ROFLMAO!
Show me a QUALIFIED reviewer, not someone who is a "text-based adventure
connoisseur". But you can't, because there isn't one who agrees with
your delusions.
One does not need to know how to design something to test something,
you megalomaniac.
I could waste my time finding lots of independant reports by lots of
independant sources but since they woud disagree with what the Great
and Mighty Jerry Stuckle, Fountain of all Knowledge that is True and
seller of light bulbs, you would just call them funny papers and the
writers incompetant.
Show me a QUALIFIED reviewer, not someone who is a "text-based adventure
connoisseur". But you can't, because there isn't one who agrees with
your delusions.

But you're too caught up in your ad hominim attacks, and are unable to
find a qualified reviewer who agrees with you - because they don't.

I'll bed your "text-based adventure connisseur" doesn't even know the
difference between a watt and a joule.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 06:07:37 UTC
Permalink
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle <***@attglobal.net> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
Because the manufacturer wants to sell their dimmers and their bulbs.

Use Phillips bulbs and there is no problem

http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/

<snip remainder>
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:15:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
Because the manufacturer wants to sell their dimmers and their bulbs.
Use Phillips bulbs and there is no problem
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
Then why do all manufacturers say the same thing?

And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?

I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 14:37:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
Because the manufacturer wants to sell their dimmers and their bulbs.
Use Phillips bulbs and there is no problem
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
Then why do all manufacturers say the same thing?
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
You are being a bit silly about this. The guy did a *test* which was
clearly pretty thorough, thorough enough that he could detect *and*
record the flickering of the bulbs when dimmed. He pretty clearly
doesn't have a manufacturer bias since the same company had the bulb
that tested as the best and another which tested as the worst in the group.

Unless the guy has a reputation for faking such tests, why would you
doubt his work? Ignoring valid test data and preferring the opinion of
manufacturers who have a clear stake in the game just seems odd.

Do you deny that the tests show at least one brand and model LED bulb
works perfectly well with a legacy dimmer?
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:09:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
Because the manufacturer wants to sell their dimmers and their bulbs.
Use Phillips bulbs and there is no problem
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
Then why do all manufacturers say the same thing?
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
You are being a bit silly about this. The guy did a *test* which was
clearly pretty thorough, thorough enough that he could detect *and*
record the flickering of the bulbs when dimmed. He pretty clearly
doesn't have a manufacturer bias since the same company had the bulb
that tested as the best and another which tested as the worst in the group.
Unless the guy has a reputation for faking such tests, why would you
doubt his work? Ignoring valid test data and preferring the opinion of
manufacturers who have a clear stake in the game just seems odd.
Do you deny that the tests show at least one brand and model LED bulb
works perfectly well with a legacy dimmer?
The guy is not an engineer - and AFAICT, has no engineering experience
at all. And I don't trust ANY tests performed by untrained personnel.

And all it shows is that ONE bulb worked properly with ONE dimmer. It
doesn't say how LONG it worked, for instance.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 15:12:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
Because the manufacturer wants to sell their dimmers and their bulbs.
Use Phillips bulbs and there is no problem
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
Then why do all manufacturers say the same thing?
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
You are being a bit silly about this. The guy did a *test* which was
clearly pretty thorough, thorough enough that he could detect *and*
record the flickering of the bulbs when dimmed. He pretty clearly
doesn't have a manufacturer bias since the same company had the bulb
that tested as the best and another which tested as the worst in the group.
Unless the guy has a reputation for faking such tests, why would you
doubt his work? Ignoring valid test data and preferring the opinion of
manufacturers who have a clear stake in the game just seems odd.
Do you deny that the tests show at least one brand and model LED bulb
works perfectly well with a legacy dimmer?
The guy is not an engineer - and AFAICT, has no engineering experience
at all. And I don't trust ANY tests performed by untrained personnel.
And all it shows is that ONE bulb worked properly with ONE dimmer. It
doesn't say how LONG it worked, for instance.
Did you actually *look* at the info?
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:23:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
How do you explain the manufacturer of dimmers says standard dimmers
cannot be used reliably?
Because the manufacturer wants to sell their dimmers and their bulbs.
Use Phillips bulbs and there is no problem
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
<snip remainder>
Then why do all manufacturers say the same thing?
And exactly what are the qualifications of the author? A "text-based
adventure connoisseur"?
I'll believe the engineers who design dimmers, not the funny pages.
You are being a bit silly about this. The guy did a *test* which was
clearly pretty thorough, thorough enough that he could detect *and*
record the flickering of the bulbs when dimmed. He pretty clearly
doesn't have a manufacturer bias since the same company had the bulb
that tested as the best and another which tested as the worst in the group.
Unless the guy has a reputation for faking such tests, why would you
doubt his work? Ignoring valid test data and preferring the opinion of
manufacturers who have a clear stake in the game just seems odd.
Do you deny that the tests show at least one brand and model LED bulb
works perfectly well with a legacy dimmer?
The guy is not an engineer - and AFAICT, has no engineering experience
at all. And I don't trust ANY tests performed by untrained personnel.
And all it shows is that ONE bulb worked properly with ONE dimmer. It
doesn't say how LONG it worked, for instance.
Did you actually *look* at the info?
Yes, I did. And my comment stands.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 02:34:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
of the lines we carry):

http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx

Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 03:51:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
That has even less information than the page I referred you to.

Your link says nothing about LED lights in general, only the Lutron
devices. As the article I referenced indicated, LEDs can be made to
work with generic phase control dimmers and the several LED bulbs I have
that work prove the point. I especially like Lutron's compatibility
list. They have a wide definition of "compatible"....

"Products on this list are considered compatible with the respective
Lutron C·L dimmers. Depending on the quality of the bulb you select,
compatible bulbs may still:
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"

LOL. If the combination does any of these things I don't consider that
to be "compatible".

Actually I find Lutron to have some real crap product as well as very
poor customer support. In order to assure I could get compatible dimmer
and lamp, I bought an LED fixture that listed part numbers for
compatible dimmers (tested in conjunction with the dimmer companies) and
bought a compatible Lutron dimmer. The result was they didn't work
properly. Clearly this particular fixture was *not* compatible with
generic dimmers and wasn't even compatible with the specified dimmer.

I contacted both Lutron and the company who made the fixture. I don't
recall the response of the LED fixture company but Lutron simply
recommended another dimmer with no mention of why they were on the
compatibility list and yet were not compatible.
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 04:50:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
That has even less information than the page I referred you to.
But it is accurate information from a manufacturer.
Post by rickman
Your link says nothing about LED lights in general, only the Lutron
devices. As the article I referenced indicated, LEDs can be made to
work with generic phase control dimmers and the several LED bulbs I have
that work prove the point. I especially like Lutron's compatibility
list. They have a wide definition of "compatible"....
Of course. But check any manufacturer of LED dimmers. They all say the
same thing in one way or another.
Post by rickman
"Products on this list are considered compatible with the respective
Lutron C·L dimmers. Depending on the quality of the bulb you select,
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
LOL. If the combination does any of these things I don't consider that
to be "compatible".
No dimmer manufacturer can control how bulbs are built. Lutron does its
best to specify what will and will not work.
Post by rickman
Actually I find Lutron to have some real crap product as well as very
poor customer support. In order to assure I could get compatible dimmer
and lamp, I bought an LED fixture that listed part numbers for
compatible dimmers (tested in conjunction with the dimmer companies) and
bought a compatible Lutron dimmer. The result was they didn't work
properly. Clearly this particular fixture was *not* compatible with
generic dimmers and wasn't even compatible with the specified dimmer.
They have excellent dealer support. And most of their sales is through
dealers like us.
Post by rickman
I contacted both Lutron and the company who made the fixture. I don't
recall the response of the LED fixture company but Lutron simply
recommended another dimmer with no mention of why they were on the
compatibility list and yet were not compatible.
Probably because they are not high on consumer sales. Dealers like us
get excellent support from them (and most manufacturers). I can even
call and talk directly with an engineer.

Their main consumer support is through the dealer you purchased it from.
If you got it from the internet or similar, you got what you paid for.
If you got it from an authorized Lutron dealer, they should support you.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 05:12:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
That has even less information than the page I referred you to.
But it is accurate information from a manufacturer.
Post by rickman
Your link says nothing about LED lights in general, only the Lutron
devices. As the article I referenced indicated, LEDs can be made to
work with generic phase control dimmers and the several LED bulbs I have
that work prove the point. I especially like Lutron's compatibility
list. They have a wide definition of "compatible"....
Of course. But check any manufacturer of LED dimmers. They all say the
same thing in one way or another.
Post by rickman
"Products on this list are considered compatible with the respective
Lutron C·L dimmers. Depending on the quality of the bulb you select,
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
LOL. If the combination does any of these things I don't consider that
to be "compatible".
No dimmer manufacturer can control how bulbs are built. Lutron does its
best to specify what will and will not work.
So why are you citing dimmer makers when we are discussing the bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Actually I find Lutron to have some real crap product as well as very
poor customer support. In order to assure I could get compatible dimmer
and lamp, I bought an LED fixture that listed part numbers for
compatible dimmers (tested in conjunction with the dimmer companies) and
bought a compatible Lutron dimmer. The result was they didn't work
properly. Clearly this particular fixture was *not* compatible with
generic dimmers and wasn't even compatible with the specified dimmer.
They have excellent dealer support. And most of their sales is through
dealers like us.
You mean dealers like Home Depot who have zero support other than
letting you return the crap that doesn't work? Like I said, the box was
labeled as being compatible with the "tested" dimmers. It wasn't unless
you define "compatible" (by the Lutron web page) as
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"

Obviously Lutron has a very broad definition of "compatible". I would
stop using them as an authority if I were you.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
I contacted both Lutron and the company who made the fixture. I don't
recall the response of the LED fixture company but Lutron simply
recommended another dimmer with no mention of why they were on the
compatibility list and yet were not compatible.
Probably because they are not high on consumer sales. Dealers like us
get excellent support from them (and most manufacturers). I can even
call and talk directly with an engineer.
Do me a favor and ask them why they consider flickering, less dimming
range, unsmooth dimming and buzzing as being acceptable in compatible
products.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Their main consumer support is through the dealer you purchased it from.
If you got it from the internet or similar, you got what you paid for.
If you got it from an authorized Lutron dealer, they should support you.
Sure, I expect I can *still* return it to Home Depot. But the point is
Lutron and the lamp company has a crappy definition of "compatible"
which means I won't be buying any more Lutron dimming products. By
their own definition they work like crap.

Meanwhile I have LED bulbs that do work properly with conventional
dimmers. Also, you have not mentioned anything about how LED bulbs are
design to work with *any* dimmers. The page I referenced provided a
design that will provide a properly functioning LED bulb truly
compatible with legacy dimmers.
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:47:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to
remove,
and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The
probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from
some
very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing
else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
That has even less information than the page I referred you to.
But it is accurate information from a manufacturer.
Post by rickman
Your link says nothing about LED lights in general, only the Lutron
devices. As the article I referenced indicated, LEDs can be made to
work with generic phase control dimmers and the several LED bulbs I have
that work prove the point. I especially like Lutron's compatibility
list. They have a wide definition of "compatible"....
Of course. But check any manufacturer of LED dimmers. They all say the
same thing in one way or another.
Post by rickman
"Products on this list are considered compatible with the respective
Lutron C·L dimmers. Depending on the quality of the bulb you select,
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
LOL. If the combination does any of these things I don't consider that
to be "compatible".
No dimmer manufacturer can control how bulbs are built. Lutron does its
best to specify what will and will not work.
So why are you citing dimmer makers when we are discussing the bulbs?
Because of the claim that any dimmer can be used with LED bulbs. And
depending on the bulbs, they may or may not work with dimmers - even
ones specifically made for LED bulbs.

For instance, there are a some cheap Chinese LED bulbs which claim to be
dimmable - but don't work reliably with ANY dimmer. And when you use
them with a dimmer, they don't last long.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Actually I find Lutron to have some real crap product as well as very
poor customer support. In order to assure I could get compatible dimmer
and lamp, I bought an LED fixture that listed part numbers for
compatible dimmers (tested in conjunction with the dimmer companies) and
bought a compatible Lutron dimmer. The result was they didn't work
properly. Clearly this particular fixture was *not* compatible with
generic dimmers and wasn't even compatible with the specified dimmer.
They have excellent dealer support. And most of their sales is through
dealers like us.
You mean dealers like Home Depot who have zero support other than
letting you return the crap that doesn't work? Like I said, the box was
labeled as being compatible with the "tested" dimmers. It wasn't unless
you define "compatible" (by the Lutron web page) as
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
Obviously Lutron has a very broad definition of "compatible". I would
stop using them as an authority if I were you.
Maybe the local store has no support, but that's not the end of their
support. To become an authorized dealer, our tech people had to go
through a lot of training (common for the better brands). Home Depot
had to do the same thing, but obviously they don't have every employee
in the country trained (nor could they maintain the training).

And yes, "compatible" means they will work - but not necessarily how
*well* they will work. And some bulbs work fine, while some don't -
even when they are the same model from the same manufacturer.

They have been a very reliable manufacturer for us in both the
residential and commercial sectors for a number of years. When properly
installed, we have had almost zero problems with their products. And we
install a lot every year.

But you don't like Lutron's comments? Here's another manufacturer:

www.leviton.com/OA_HTML/SectionDisplay.jsp?section=37698&minisite=10251

Or this one (a non-engineering sales pitch, but saying the same thing)

http://www.legrand.us/resources-and-downloads/articles/5-myths-of-universal-dimmers.aspx
(download the article)
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
I contacted both Lutron and the company who made the fixture. I don't
recall the response of the LED fixture company but Lutron simply
recommended another dimmer with no mention of why they were on the
compatibility list and yet were not compatible.
Probably because they are not high on consumer sales. Dealers like us
get excellent support from them (and most manufacturers). I can even
call and talk directly with an engineer.
Do me a favor and ask them why they consider flickering, less dimming
range, unsmooth dimming and buzzing as being acceptable in compatible
products.
Compatible does not mean it will work perfectly. True in ANY business.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Their main consumer support is through the dealer you purchased it from.
If you got it from the internet or similar, you got what you paid for.
If you got it from an authorized Lutron dealer, they should support you.
Sure, I expect I can *still* return it to Home Depot. But the point is
Lutron and the lamp company has a crappy definition of "compatible"
which means I won't be buying any more Lutron dimming products. By
their own definition they work like crap.
Meanwhile I have LED bulbs that do work properly with conventional
dimmers. Also, you have not mentioned anything about how LED bulbs are
design to work with *any* dimmers. The page I referenced provided a
design that will provide a properly functioning LED bulb truly
compatible with legacy dimmers.
No, their definition is the same as that in any market. Compatible does
not mean things will work perfectly.

As to the article - you mean the one titled "LED lighting must work with
legacy dimming technologies"? The one with an obvious agenda?

Did you even read the article? How about Table 1 where it states that
phase dimmers have problems with LED lighting? In fact, some of the
same problems I have already mentioned?

And BTW - what are the author's credentials? Is he an engineer who
knows what he's talking about, or just some blogger who's read a few
articles? The lack of a short bio is noticeable.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 15:26:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to
remove,
and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The
probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from
some
very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could
use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing
else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
That has even less information than the page I referred you to.
But it is accurate information from a manufacturer.
Post by rickman
Your link says nothing about LED lights in general, only the Lutron
devices. As the article I referenced indicated, LEDs can be made to
work with generic phase control dimmers and the several LED bulbs I have
that work prove the point. I especially like Lutron's compatibility
list. They have a wide definition of "compatible"....
Of course. But check any manufacturer of LED dimmers. They all say the
same thing in one way or another.
Post by rickman
"Products on this list are considered compatible with the respective
Lutron C·L dimmers. Depending on the quality of the bulb you select,
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
LOL. If the combination does any of these things I don't consider that
to be "compatible".
No dimmer manufacturer can control how bulbs are built. Lutron does its
best to specify what will and will not work.
So why are you citing dimmer makers when we are discussing the bulbs?
Because of the claim that any dimmer can be used with LED bulbs. And
depending on the bulbs, they may or may not work with dimmers - even
ones specifically made for LED bulbs.
For instance, there are a some cheap Chinese LED bulbs which claim to be
dimmable - but don't work reliably with ANY dimmer. And when you use
them with a dimmer, they don't last long.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Actually I find Lutron to have some real crap product as well as very
poor customer support. In order to assure I could get compatible dimmer
and lamp, I bought an LED fixture that listed part numbers for
compatible dimmers (tested in conjunction with the dimmer companies) and
bought a compatible Lutron dimmer. The result was they didn't work
properly. Clearly this particular fixture was *not* compatible with
generic dimmers and wasn't even compatible with the specified dimmer.
They have excellent dealer support. And most of their sales is through
dealers like us.
You mean dealers like Home Depot who have zero support other than
letting you return the crap that doesn't work? Like I said, the box was
labeled as being compatible with the "tested" dimmers. It wasn't unless
you define "compatible" (by the Lutron web page) as
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
Obviously Lutron has a very broad definition of "compatible". I would
stop using them as an authority if I were you.
Maybe the local store has no support, but that's not the end of their
support. To become an authorized dealer, our tech people had to go
through a lot of training (common for the better brands). Home Depot
had to do the same thing, but obviously they don't have every employee
in the country trained (nor could they maintain the training).
Good luck trying to find *anyone* in the store with "training" in
dimmers. I did and found no one who could help me pick out compatible
devices.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And yes, "compatible" means they will work - but not necessarily how
*well* they will work. And some bulbs work fine, while some don't -
even when they are the same model from the same manufacturer.
There you go. A bulb or dimmer can be total crap, producing totally
unacceptable operation and that is ok with the maker. But as long as it
was certified as "compatible" by an engineer, that's ok with you too.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
They have been a very reliable manufacturer for us in both the
residential and commercial sectors for a number of years. When properly
installed, we have had almost zero problems with their products. And we
install a lot every year.
www.leviton.com/OA_HTML/SectionDisplay.jsp?section=37698&minisite=10251
This page doesn't say anything like what you are saying.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Or this one (a non-engineering sales pitch, but saying the same thing)
http://www.legrand.us/resources-and-downloads/articles/5-myths-of-universal-dimmers.aspx
(download the article)
This one isn't even about the bulbs, it is only about dimmers. You seem
to be looking at this from the wrong perspective. Let me recap...

You...
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Me...
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
No, you can't use just any dimmer with just any bulb. But as the
article from the possibly "non-engineer" there are bulbs that will work
with any dimmer which is what I said.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
I contacted both Lutron and the company who made the fixture. I don't
recall the response of the LED fixture company but Lutron simply
recommended another dimmer with no mention of why they were on the
compatibility list and yet were not compatible.
Probably because they are not high on consumer sales. Dealers like us
get excellent support from them (and most manufacturers). I can even
call and talk directly with an engineer.
Do me a favor and ask them why they consider flickering, less dimming
range, unsmooth dimming and buzzing as being acceptable in compatible
products.
Compatible does not mean it will work perfectly. True in ANY business.
Lol! That is the road to returns and is a line of BS.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Their main consumer support is through the dealer you purchased it from.
If you got it from the internet or similar, you got what you paid for.
If you got it from an authorized Lutron dealer, they should support you.
Sure, I expect I can *still* return it to Home Depot. But the point is
Lutron and the lamp company has a crappy definition of "compatible"
which means I won't be buying any more Lutron dimming products. By
their own definition they work like crap.
Meanwhile I have LED bulbs that do work properly with conventional
dimmers. Also, you have not mentioned anything about how LED bulbs are
design to work with *any* dimmers. The page I referenced provided a
design that will provide a properly functioning LED bulb truly
compatible with legacy dimmers.
No, their definition is the same as that in any market. Compatible does
not mean things will work perfectly.
As to the article - you mean the one titled "LED lighting must work with
legacy dimming technologies"? The one with an obvious agenda?
Really? What is the agenda?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Did you even read the article? How about Table 1 where it states that
phase dimmers have problems with LED lighting? In fact, some of the
same problems I have already mentioned?
No one ever said all LEDs will work with all dimmers. You keep
recycling the same arguments.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And BTW - what are the author's credentials? Is he an engineer who
knows what he's talking about, or just some blogger who's read a few
articles? The lack of a short bio is noticeable.
How many engineers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

Ok, I guess I'm done with this conversation. Enjoy.
--
Rick
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:36:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors gareth
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to
remove,
and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The
probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from
some
very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could
use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by
changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is
proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing
else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation
issues
aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without
some
kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You two are both speculating and have limited information to base either
of your opinions on. Jim says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
which is not correct in that most dimmers work by reducing the phase
angle of the applied AC or to reduce noise some simply don't turn on for
entire half cycles.
Jerry says,
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
Try reading a little...
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/led-lighting-must-work-with-legacy-dimming-technologies-magazine.html
Rickman, here's a better page from the manufacturer of dimmers (and one
http://www.lutron.com/en-US/Education-Training/Pages/LCE/DimmingCFLsandLEDs.aspx
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
That has even less information than the page I referred you to.
But it is accurate information from a manufacturer.
Post by rickman
Your link says nothing about LED lights in general, only the Lutron
devices. As the article I referenced indicated, LEDs can be made to
work with generic phase control dimmers and the several LED bulbs I have
that work prove the point. I especially like Lutron's compatibility
list. They have a wide definition of "compatible"....
Of course. But check any manufacturer of LED dimmers. They all say the
same thing in one way or another.
Post by rickman
"Products on this list are considered compatible with the respective
Lutron C·L dimmers. Depending on the quality of the bulb you select,
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
LOL. If the combination does any of these things I don't consider that
to be "compatible".
No dimmer manufacturer can control how bulbs are built. Lutron does its
best to specify what will and will not work.
So why are you citing dimmer makers when we are discussing the bulbs?
Because of the claim that any dimmer can be used with LED bulbs. And
depending on the bulbs, they may or may not work with dimmers - even
ones specifically made for LED bulbs.
For instance, there are a some cheap Chinese LED bulbs which claim to be
dimmable - but don't work reliably with ANY dimmer. And when you use
them with a dimmer, they don't last long.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Actually I find Lutron to have some real crap product as well as very
poor customer support. In order to assure I could get compatible dimmer
and lamp, I bought an LED fixture that listed part numbers for
compatible dimmers (tested in conjunction with the dimmer
companies) and
bought a compatible Lutron dimmer. The result was they didn't work
properly. Clearly this particular fixture was *not* compatible with
generic dimmers and wasn't even compatible with the specified dimmer.
They have excellent dealer support. And most of their sales is through
dealers like us.
You mean dealers like Home Depot who have zero support other than
letting you return the crap that doesn't work? Like I said, the box was
labeled as being compatible with the "tested" dimmers. It wasn't unless
you define "compatible" (by the Lutron web page) as
- have less dimming range than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- dim less smoothly than an incandescent or halogen bulb
- flicker or shimmer at certain light levels
- buzz"
Obviously Lutron has a very broad definition of "compatible". I would
stop using them as an authority if I were you.
Maybe the local store has no support, but that's not the end of their
support. To become an authorized dealer, our tech people had to go
through a lot of training (common for the better brands). Home Depot
had to do the same thing, but obviously they don't have every employee
in the country trained (nor could they maintain the training).
Good luck trying to find *anyone* in the store with "training" in
dimmers. I did and found no one who could help me pick out compatible
devices.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And yes, "compatible" means they will work - but not necessarily how
*well* they will work. And some bulbs work fine, while some don't -
even when they are the same model from the same manufacturer.
There you go. A bulb or dimmer can be total crap, producing totally
unacceptable operation and that is ok with the maker. But as long as it
was certified as "compatible" by an engineer, that's ok with you too.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
They have been a very reliable manufacturer for us in both the
residential and commercial sectors for a number of years. When properly
installed, we have had almost zero problems with their products. And we
install a lot every year.
www.leviton.com/OA_HTML/SectionDisplay.jsp?section=37698&minisite=10251
This page doesn't say anything like what you are saying.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Or this one (a non-engineering sales pitch, but saying the same thing)
http://www.legrand.us/resources-and-downloads/articles/5-myths-of-universal-dimmers.aspx
(download the article)
This one isn't even about the bulbs, it is only about dimmers. You seem
to be looking at this from the wrong perspective. Let me recap...
You...
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED
bulbs?
Me...
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Which is wrong because you can use "standard" dimmers, but the LED bulb
has to be designed for it.
No, you can't use just any dimmer with just any bulb. But as the
article from the possibly "non-engineer" there are bulbs that will work
with any dimmer which is what I said.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
I contacted both Lutron and the company who made the fixture. I don't
recall the response of the LED fixture company but Lutron simply
recommended another dimmer with no mention of why they were on the
compatibility list and yet were not compatible.
Probably because they are not high on consumer sales. Dealers like us
get excellent support from them (and most manufacturers). I can even
call and talk directly with an engineer.
Do me a favor and ask them why they consider flickering, less dimming
range, unsmooth dimming and buzzing as being acceptable in compatible
products.
Compatible does not mean it will work perfectly. True in ANY business.
Lol! That is the road to returns and is a line of BS.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Their main consumer support is through the dealer you purchased it from.
If you got it from the internet or similar, you got what you paid for.
If you got it from an authorized Lutron dealer, they should support you.
Sure, I expect I can *still* return it to Home Depot. But the point is
Lutron and the lamp company has a crappy definition of "compatible"
which means I won't be buying any more Lutron dimming products. By
their own definition they work like crap.
Meanwhile I have LED bulbs that do work properly with conventional
dimmers. Also, you have not mentioned anything about how LED bulbs are
design to work with *any* dimmers. The page I referenced provided a
design that will provide a properly functioning LED bulb truly
compatible with legacy dimmers.
No, their definition is the same as that in any market. Compatible does
not mean things will work perfectly.
As to the article - you mean the one titled "LED lighting must work with
legacy dimming technologies"? The one with an obvious agenda?
Really? What is the agenda?
Just what it says. "LED lighting MUST work...". And anything less is
unacceptable.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Did you even read the article? How about Table 1 where it states that
phase dimmers have problems with LED lighting? In fact, some of the
same problems I have already mentioned?
No one ever said all LEDs will work with all dimmers. You keep
recycling the same arguments.
It didn't even say all dimmable LED bulbs work with all legacy dimmers.
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And BTW - what are the author's credentials? Is he an engineer who
knows what he's talking about, or just some blogger who's read a few
articles? The lack of a short bio is noticeable.
How many engineers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
Ok, I guess I'm done with this conversation. Enjoy.
Obviously you would rather believe an article by someone with no
demonstrable technical knowledge to engineers who design and have an
intimate knowledge of the technology.

"My mind is made up. Don't confuse me with the facts."
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 04:02:04 UTC
Permalink
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle <***@attglobal.net> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
No, thet don't, it depends on the manufacturer of the bulb.

Here's a couple of references from someone that does not sell light bulbs
or dimmers:

http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/

http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 04:57:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
No, thet don't, it depends on the manufacturer of the bulb.
Here's a couple of references from someone that does not sell light bulbs
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
I find cnet to be more reliable than PC Magazine - but that isn't saying
much. They are a consumer-oriented site, and dumb down their reports
significantly to meet the average reader's intelligence (which means
about the third-grade level - seriously). And please note the first
reference is a person who is a "CNET How-to expert" and the second a
"text-based adventure connoisseur".. Neither is an engineer. What are
their credentials - except that they got paid?

I'll go by the manufacturers which product the goods - and they all say
the same thing. When in doubt, find out from the experts.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
rickman
2014-11-29 05:24:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
No, thet don't, it depends on the manufacturer of the bulb.
Here's a couple of references from someone that does not sell light bulbs
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
I find cnet to be more reliable than PC Magazine - but that isn't saying
much. They are a consumer-oriented site, and dumb down their reports
significantly to meet the average reader's intelligence (which means
about the third-grade level - seriously). And please note the first
reference is a person who is a "CNET How-to expert" and the second a
"text-based adventure connoisseur".. Neither is an engineer. What are
their credentials - except that they got paid?
I'll go by the manufacturers which product the goods - and they all say
the same thing. When in doubt, find out from the experts.
Great review link. I think this shows conclusively that there are LED
bulbs that work with legacy dimmers. Regardless of what the "experts"
may say. :)
--
Rick
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 06:13:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
No, thet don't, it depends on the manufacturer of the bulb.
Here's a couple of references from someone that does not sell light bulbs
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
I find cnet to be more reliable than PC Magazine - but that isn't saying
much. They are a consumer-oriented site, and dumb down their reports
significantly to meet the average reader's intelligence (which means
about the third-grade level - seriously). And please note the first
reference is a person who is a "CNET How-to expert" and the second a
"text-based adventure connoisseur".. Neither is an engineer. What are
their credentials - except that they got paid?
I'll go by the manufacturers which product the goods - and they all say
the same thing. When in doubt, find out from the experts.
Great review link. I think this shows conclusively that there are LED
bulbs that work with legacy dimmers. Regardless of what the "experts"
may say. :)
Just the "experts" that have dimmers to sell...
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:50:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by rickman
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
No, thet don't, it depends on the manufacturer of the bulb.
Here's a couple of references from someone that does not sell light bulbs
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
I find cnet to be more reliable than PC Magazine - but that isn't saying
much. They are a consumer-oriented site, and dumb down their reports
significantly to meet the average reader's intelligence (which means
about the third-grade level - seriously). And please note the first
reference is a person who is a "CNET How-to expert" and the second a
"text-based adventure connoisseur".. Neither is an engineer. What are
their credentials - except that they got paid?
I'll go by the manufacturers which product the goods - and they all say
the same thing. When in doubt, find out from the experts.
Great review link. I think this shows conclusively that there are LED
bulbs that work with legacy dimmers. Regardless of what the "experts"
may say. :)
Just the "experts" that have dimmers to sell...
If they lied in their statements, the FTC would be after them in a
second. They are very aggressive about such things.

And not all manufacturers would be saying the same thing.

But then you know everything, and you are always right. And anyone who
disagrees with you is a liar or doesn't know what he's talking about.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 06:13:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Note the paragraph under "Do all LED and CFL light bulbs work with all
dimmers?"
No, thet don't, it depends on the manufacturer of the bulb.
Here's a couple of references from someone that does not sell light bulbs
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
I find cnet to be more reliable than PC Magazine - but that isn't saying
much. They are a consumer-oriented site, and dumb down their reports
significantly to meet the average reader's intelligence (which means
about the third-grade level - seriously). And please note the first
reference is a person who is a "CNET How-to expert" and the second a
"text-based adventure connoisseur".. Neither is an engineer. What are
their credentials - except that they got paid?
Yes, they are getting paid, but not to sell light bulbs or dimmers
Post by Jerry Stuckle
I'll go by the manufacturers which product the goods - and they all say
the same thing. When in doubt, find out from the experts.
Nope, Philips says nothing like your favorite company.

And the funny thing is, CNET judged Phillip among the best.
--
Jim Pennino
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 00:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Yes, for LED bulbs.

However, the simplest way to see that the light output is controlled
by the applied voltage is to simply look at the base of a dimmable
bulb and note that there are only two connections; no third connection
for a control, just the same as all other light bulbs.

Some are dimmable and some are not because it takes more parts to make
a dimmable bulb and the demand for them is less than that for non-dimmable
bulbs.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Nope; light bulbs run at a rated voltage which is the standard voltage
for the country in which they are sold; US light bulbs are rated for
120v, UK bulbs for whatever the voltage is over there, I think 240V.

You are just arguing for the sake of arguing.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
You can if the bulb is specified as dimmable; some are, and some are not
and they all use the standard two connection E26 base.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
None of this has anything to do with high voltage.

The standard US wall outlet is rated at 15 Amps.

A Phillips A21 75W replacement LED bulb draws 15W at 120V (0.125A)
and is dimmable.

http://www.usa.philips.com/c-p/046677432164/led-15w-75w-medium-base-e26-soft-white-dimmable
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You obiously have never noticed that the base of an LED bulb is identical
to that of an incandescent, i.e. two wire E26 base, and that standard wall
outlets in the US are 15 Amps.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 01:56:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Yes, for LED bulbs.
Once again you show your ignorance.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
However, the simplest way to see that the light output is controlled
by the applied voltage is to simply look at the base of a dimmable
bulb and note that there are only two connections; no third connection
for a control, just the same as all other light bulbs.
Which means nothing.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Some are dimmable and some are not because it takes more parts to make
a dimmable bulb and the demand for them is less than that for non-dimmable
bulbs.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Nope; light bulbs run at a rated voltage which is the standard voltage
for the country in which they are sold; US light bulbs are rated for
120v, UK bulbs for whatever the voltage is over there, I think 240V.
You are just arguing for the sake of arguing.
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
You can if the bulb is specified as dimmable; some are, and some are not
and they all use the standard two connection E26 base.
Wrong again.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
None of this has anything to do with high voltage.
It has to do with the current required by the bulbs.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
The standard US wall outlet is rated at 15 Amps.
A Phillips A21 75W replacement LED bulb draws 15W at 120V (0.125A)
and is dimmable.
Yes, and at 3V that would require 5 amps. At 120V that would be 600W,
not 15W.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
http://www.usa.philips.com/c-p/046677432164/led-15w-75w-medium-base-e26-soft-white-dimmable
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You obiously have never noticed that the base of an LED bulb is identical
to that of an incandescent, i.e. two wire E26 base, and that standard wall
outlets in the US are 15 Amps.
Which only means they can plug into a standard socket and run off of 120V.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 02:10:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Yes, for LED bulbs.
Once again you show your ignorance.
Once again you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
However, the simplest way to see that the light output is controlled
by the applied voltage is to simply look at the base of a dimmable
bulb and note that there are only two connections; no third connection
for a control, just the same as all other light bulbs.
Which means nothing.
Which means there can not be a control wire for a variable regulator.

The only input a light bulb has is the input voltage.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Some are dimmable and some are not because it takes more parts to make
a dimmable bulb and the demand for them is less than that for non-dimmable
bulbs.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Nope; light bulbs run at a rated voltage which is the standard voltage
for the country in which they are sold; US light bulbs are rated for
120v, UK bulbs for whatever the voltage is over there, I think 240V.
You are just arguing for the sake of arguing.
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
I forgot that you are an expert on EVERYTHING and to call into question
anything you say is the ultimate insult.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
You can if the bulb is specified as dimmable; some are, and some are not
and they all use the standard two connection E26 base.
Wrong again.
Yes, right again.

Light bulbs in the US use the E26 base and some are dimmable and some are
not.

If you have doubts, go into Home Depot, Lowe's, or any place that sells
light bulbs and look.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
None of this has anything to do with high voltage.
It has to do with the current required by the bulbs.
Which is two orders of magnitudes less than what a standard US outlet
is capable of supplying.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
The standard US wall outlet is rated at 15 Amps.
A Phillips A21 75W replacement LED bulb draws 15W at 120V (0.125A)
and is dimmable.
Yes, and at 3V that would require 5 amps. At 120V that would be 600W,
not 15W.
So what is your claim here; that LED light bulbs HAVE to hae a transformer?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
http://www.usa.philips.com/c-p/046677432164/led-15w-75w-medium-base-e26-soft-white-dimmable
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You obiously have never noticed that the base of an LED bulb is identical
to that of an incandescent, i.e. two wire E26 base, and that standard wall
outlets in the US are 15 Amps.
Which only means they can plug into a standard socket and run off of 120V.
Again you are arguing for the sake of arguing.

How long until you start with your usual ad hominems?
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 02:31:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
You do realize that a dimmable light bulb is dimmed by changeing the
supply voltage and not by anything else connected to the bulb?
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
Yes, for LED bulbs.
Once again you show your ignorance.
Once again you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
No, I'm just telling you that you are wrong - and why. YOU are the one
arguing for the sake of arguing - and in the process, proving your
ignorance.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
However, the simplest way to see that the light output is controlled
by the applied voltage is to simply look at the base of a dimmable
bulb and note that there are only two connections; no third connection
for a control, just the same as all other light bulbs.
Which means nothing.
Which means there can not be a control wire for a variable regulator.
The only input a light bulb has is the input voltage.
So what? You don't need a control wire for a dimmable LED bulb (or any
other). It's in the signal being fed to the bulb.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Some are dimmable and some are not because it takes more parts to make
a dimmable bulb and the demand for them is less than that for non-dimmable
bulbs.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
To specifically answer your question, you design a regulator who's output
is some precentage of the raw input as opposed to a regulator who's
output is always equal to some reference voltage.
Again, it all depends.
Nope; light bulbs run at a rated voltage which is the standard voltage
for the country in which they are sold; US light bulbs are rated for
120v, UK bulbs for whatever the voltage is over there, I think 240V.
You are just arguing for the sake of arguing.
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
I forgot that you are an expert on EVERYTHING and to call into question
anything you say is the ultimate insult.
You've just proven once again that you're an expert in NOTHING.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
And to be yet more specific, since LED brightness is proportional to
current and resistors would waste power, the regulator would be a
current regulator with an average current output proportional to the
raw input voltage.
Then why can't you use standard incandescent dimmers with LED bulbs?
You can if the bulb is specified as dimmable; some are, and some are not
and they all use the standard two connection E26 base.
Wrong again.
Yes, right again.
Light bulbs in the US use the E26 base and some are dimmable and some are
not.
If you have doubts, go into Home Depot, Lowe's, or any place that sells
light bulbs and look.
I never said anything different. What I said was that LED bulbs cannot
be dimmed with a standard incandescent dimmer.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
True for IC regulators. Hoever high voltage transistors exist these
days which makes designing a high voltage regulator pretty trivial.
Sure. But how do you handle the current requirements without some kind
of transformer?
Well, assuming you want some voltage greater than the wall plug maximum,
the need for a transformer is pretty much a given unless some sort of
voltage multiplying rectifier is sufficient for the need, which is
where the current requirement becomes relevant.
However, the subject was high voltage regulators, not where does the
raw high voltage come from.
And where do you get the current necessary to supply the LEDs in the
bulbs? A typical LED required around 3V (usually 2.7V to 3.3V,
depending on the LED)? A 9 watt LED would require 3 amps of current.
Or, if the LEDs were in series, something less. But without a
transformer, the current would still exceed that of an incandescent bulb.
None of this has anything to do with high voltage.
It has to do with the current required by the bulbs.
Which is two orders of magnitudes less than what a standard US outlet
is capable of supplying.
Sure. But you miss the fact that 5 amps is 5 amps - whether at 3V or 120V.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
The standard US wall outlet is rated at 15 Amps.
A Phillips A21 75W replacement LED bulb draws 15W at 120V (0.125A)
and is dimmable.
Yes, and at 3V that would require 5 amps. At 120V that would be 600W,
not 15W.
So what is your claim here; that LED light bulbs HAVE to hae a transformer?
Yes. The bulbs have electronic circuitry in the base which include a
switching power supply and high frequency transformer.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
http://www.usa.philips.com/c-p/046677432164/led-15w-75w-medium-base-e26-soft-white-dimmable
Post by Jerry Stuckle
You obviously are unfamiliar with the structure of LED bulbs.
You obiously have never noticed that the base of an LED bulb is identical
to that of an incandescent, i.e. two wire E26 base, and that standard wall
outlets in the US are 15 Amps.
Which only means they can plug into a standard socket and run off of 120V.
Again you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
How long until you start with your usual ad hominems?
Which just shows that you are arguing for the sake of arguing, and in
doing so, showing your ignorance.

As for the ad hominem attacks - you're the king of those, as has been
repeatedly proven.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 04:09:06 UTC
Permalink
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
I forgot that you are an expert on EVERYTHING and to call into question
anything you say is the ultimate insult.
You've just proven once again that you're an expert in NOTHING.
And you've just proven once again that all that you know is what you have
supposedly done, not what exists in the world.

Here is a couple of articles on the subject from people who do NOT make
a living selling either light bulbs or controls.

http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/

It seems that yes, dimmable LED bulbs are available for legacy dimmers,
and they work just fine.

<snip>
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 04:59:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
I forgot that you are an expert on EVERYTHING and to call into question
anything you say is the ultimate insult.
You've just proven once again that you're an expert in NOTHING.
And you've just proven once again that all that you know is what you have
supposedly done, not what exists in the world.
Here is a couple of articles on the subject from people who do NOT make
a living selling either light bulbs or controls.
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
It seems that yes, dimmable LED bulbs are available for legacy dimmers,
and they work just fine.
<snip>
Right. By a "CNET How-to expert" and a "text-based adventure game
connoisseur". Real experts!

I'll go by what the engineers who design the devices say. You keep
reading the funnies.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 06:15:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
I forgot that you are an expert on EVERYTHING and to call into question
anything you say is the ultimate insult.
You've just proven once again that you're an expert in NOTHING.
And you've just proven once again that all that you know is what you have
supposedly done, not what exists in the world.
Here is a couple of articles on the subject from people who do NOT make
a living selling either light bulbs or controls.
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
It seems that yes, dimmable LED bulbs are available for legacy dimmers,
and they work just fine.
<snip>
Right. By a "CNET How-to expert" and a "text-based adventure game
connoisseur". Real experts!
I'll go by what the engineers who design the devices say. You keep
reading the funnies.
You mean the engineers working for the company that is trying to sell
dimmers and bulbs?

I'll go by the guy who doesn't have a dog in the race.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:51:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, I am arguing from facts - unlike you. I've been in the business of
installing lighting control (and other things) for 11 years now. We
install numerous LED control systems every year.
I forgot that you are an expert on EVERYTHING and to call into question
anything you say is the ultimate insult.
You've just proven once again that you're an expert in NOTHING.
And you've just proven once again that all that you know is what you have
supposedly done, not what exists in the world.
Here is a couple of articles on the subject from people who do NOT make
a living selling either light bulbs or controls.
http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-things-to-consider-before-buying-led-bulbs/
http://www.cnet.com/news/which-led-light-bulbs-are-best-for-dimming/
It seems that yes, dimmable LED bulbs are available for legacy dimmers,
and they work just fine.
<snip>
Right. By a "CNET How-to expert" and a "text-based adventure game
connoisseur". Real experts!
I'll go by what the engineers who design the devices say. You keep
reading the funnies.
You mean the engineers working for the company that is trying to sell
dimmers and bulbs?
I'll go by the guy who doesn't have a dog in the race.
If they lied in their statements, the FTC would be after them in a
second. They are very aggressive about such things.

And not all manufacturers would be saying the same thing.

But then you know everything, and you are always right. And anyone who
disagrees with you is a liar or doesn't know what he's talking about.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 18:06:01 UTC
Permalink
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle <***@attglobal.net> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If they lied in their statements, the FTC would be after them in a
second. They are very aggressive about such things.
Only if people complain first or if the statements are blatent and
very visible as on TV.

I did not say they lied, which is irrelevant, as they were only talking
about their products.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And not all manufacturers would be saying the same thing.
Not all manufacturers are saying the same thing.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
But then you know everything, and you are always right. And anyone who
disagrees with you is a liar or doesn't know what he's talking about.
I am not the one selling light bulbs and neither are the people that also
disagree with you.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 01:18:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If they lied in their statements, the FTC would be after them in a
second. They are very aggressive about such things.
Only if people complain first or if the statements are blatent and
very visible as on TV.
Incorrect. The FTC takes actions on their own quite often.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
I did not say they lied, which is irrelevant, as they were only talking
about their products.
Either they are correct or they lied. Which one is it?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And not all manufacturers would be saying the same thing.
Not all manufacturers are saying the same thing.
Which ones are not?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
But then you know everything, and you are always right. And anyone who
disagrees with you is a liar or doesn't know what he's talking about.
I am not the one selling light bulbs and neither are the people that also
disagree with you.
No, and you're not experts in the field. The engineers I've worked with
are.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 03:19:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If they lied in their statements, the FTC would be after them in a
second. They are very aggressive about such things.
Only if people complain first or if the statements are blatent and
very visible as on TV.
Incorrect. The FTC takes actions on their own quite often.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
I did not say they lied, which is irrelevant, as they were only talking
about their products.
Either they are correct or they lied. Which one is it?
They were correct in what they said about their own products, but that
is irrelevant.

The bottom line is that it was implied that something you did, used, made,
worked with, said, observed, or in this case, sold, was less than perfect,
at which point you went off into one of your usual rages.

Once the rage starts, the other person is a troll, an anonymous troll, a
liar, ignorant, stupid and a few other of your usual ad hominem responses.

Now you are calling those doing independant reviews the funny pages.

Once the rage really gets going, you start interpreting what the other
person says as having the opposite meaning to what was said and saying
the other person said things that were never said, just like the "correct
or lied" statement above.

During the rage you go off onto tangets based on your misinterpretation of
the other persons responses that can only be seen though your blood lust
filled eyes.

The rage will often continue across topics and sometimes even groups
as blood lust within you boils over.

This will continue until everyone else gives up and you have the last
word.

You are just a thin skinned, egomaniacal playground bully with delusions
of perfection.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 03:37:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If they lied in their statements, the FTC would be after them in a
second. They are very aggressive about such things.
Only if people complain first or if the statements are blatent and
very visible as on TV.
Incorrect. The FTC takes actions on their own quite often.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
I did not say they lied, which is irrelevant, as they were only talking
about their products.
Either they are correct or they lied. Which one is it?
They were correct in what they said about their own products, but that
is irrelevant.
Then you admit they were correct.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
The bottom line is that it was implied that something you did, used, made,
worked with, said, observed, or in this case, sold, was less than perfect,
at which point you went off into one of your usual rages.
Nope, no rage here, Jimmy. But once again you've lost it. Just like
you always do, when you can't argue facts, you start with the adhominim
attacks.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Once the rage starts, the other person is a troll, an anonymous troll, a
liar, ignorant, stupid and a few other of your usual ad hominem responses.
You're the one with the attacks.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Now you are calling those doing independant reviews the funny pages.
Because that's what they are. Show me the qualifications of the author.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Once the rage really gets going, you start interpreting what the other
person says as having the opposite meaning to what was said and saying
the other person said things that were never said, just like the "correct
or lied" statement above.
Nope, just quoting what YOU said, Jimmy. But once again, you're off on
your usual tangent when you can't argue the facts.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
During the rage you go off onto tangets based on your misinterpretation of
the other persons responses that can only be seen though your blood lust
filled eyes.
I'm not the one on a tangent, Jimmy. I've kept on topic. You're the
one with the ad hominim attacks.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
The rage will often continue across topics and sometimes even groups
as blood lust within you boils over.
This will continue until everyone else gives up and you have the last
word.
You are just a thin skinned, egomaniacal playground bully with delusions
of perfection.
Once again you show you've lost it, Jimmy.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Rob
2014-11-29 09:30:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.

This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics
in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent
on the mains voltage, and now you are cutting down the mains power.
(not even the voltage, really)

You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack.
Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in
front of it?

No, not really. When you turn down the dimmer, the supply will first
try all it can do to keep the voltage at 13.8, and at some point it can
not achieve that anymore and the voltage will drop, but it will not
be stabilized anymore.

Similarly, a LED bulb may keep constant light emission for a large part
of the dimmer setpoint range, and at some point it goes down in intensity
in an erratic way.


We are just in the first phase of LED lighting deployment, the
"compatability" phase where the bulbs are still using existing form
factors of incandescent bulbs, and are supplied with mains voltage
that is converted to current inside the bulb. It is not the best
solution to use such bulbs in combination with existing dimmers.

Of course a next phase will be to use more reasonable form factors and
connection, where the electronics have a light level setpoint that
determines the LED current and the mains voltage is directly applied
without intermediate phase-cut dimmer.
gareth
2014-11-29 12:15:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob
This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics
in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent
on the mains voltage
Aah! I had not considered the possibility of further integration within the
semiconductor
of the LED.
gareth
2014-11-29 12:25:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by gareth
Post by Rob
This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics
in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent
on the mains voltage
Aah! I had not considered the possibility of further integration within
the semiconductor
of the LED.
Clearly I'm behind the times, for all my LEDs are just that.

In 1972 in my final year at Uni (electronics) I was drawing £3 per week for
all living expenses, and £3 was the cost of an LED, and one of my
contemporaries had special dispensation to include an LED in
his 3rd year project!

(STUDENT grant was £365, £1 per day, and tuition fees
were paid)
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 14:58:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
Post by Rob
This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics
in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent
on the mains voltage, and now you are cutting down the mains power.
(not even the voltage, really)
True - but non-dimmable bulbs do not work with other dimmers for the
same reason.
Post by Rob
You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack.
Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in
front of it?
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
Post by Rob
No, not really. When you turn down the dimmer, the supply will first
try all it can do to keep the voltage at 13.8, and at some point it can
not achieve that anymore and the voltage will drop, but it will not
be stabilized anymore.
Similarly, a LED bulb may keep constant light emission for a large part
of the dimmer setpoint range, and at some point it goes down in intensity
in an erratic way.
Pretty much, yes. But that is true for any non-dimmable bulb with any
dimmer.
Post by Rob
We are just in the first phase of LED lighting deployment, the
"compatability" phase where the bulbs are still using existing form
factors of incandescent bulbs, and are supplied with mains voltage
that is converted to current inside the bulb. It is not the best
solution to use such bulbs in combination with existing dimmers.
Of course a next phase will be to use more reasonable form factors and
connection, where the electronics have a light level setpoint that
determines the LED current and the mains voltage is directly applied
without intermediate phase-cut dimmer.
There are already dimmers made for LEDs which work well. And there are
commercial systems which use low voltage to drive the LEDs. But these
are all proprietary; there are no standards for LED lighting yet.
Eventually, maybe standards will be developed for the commercial market,
but right now there is zero push for such standards.

It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Rob
2014-11-29 15:12:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
Maybe not in your world, but here we can buy TRIAC dimmers and LED bulbs
that work together.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack.
Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in
front of it?
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works
completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for
current, but that is another matter.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
There are already dimmers made for LEDs which work well. And there are
commercial systems which use low voltage to drive the LEDs. But these
are all proprietary; there are no standards for LED lighting yet.
Eventually, maybe standards will be developed for the commercial market,
but right now there is zero push for such standards.
It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
LED is about current, not about voltage. A lighting system can put many
LEDs in series and use a higher voltage. What is important is that the
supply circuit gets separated from the bulb, so that it can be made dimmable,
externally controlled, etc and the LED gets DC current supply.

The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that
into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date,
but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now
everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power
with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation.
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:32:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
Maybe not in your world, but here we can buy TRIAC dimmers and LED bulbs
that work together.
Maybe you THINK they work. But there are a number of problems (some of
which I have identified in this thread) which show they don't work well
together.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack.
Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in
front of it?
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works
completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for
current, but that is another matter.
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.

The first difference you are ignoring is your power supply is constant
voltage. A LED power supply is constant current. They work on entirely
different principles.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
There are already dimmers made for LEDs which work well. And there are
commercial systems which use low voltage to drive the LEDs. But these
are all proprietary; there are no standards for LED lighting yet.
Eventually, maybe standards will be developed for the commercial market,
but right now there is zero push for such standards.
It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
LED is about current, not about voltage. A lighting system can put many
LEDs in series and use a higher voltage. What is important is that the
supply circuit gets separated from the bulb, so that it can be made dimmable,
externally controlled, etc and the LED gets DC current supply.
Sure they can be connected in series. But that has it's own problems;
you can only go so far. And yes, the LED gets a DC supply - but it's
the generation of the constant current source which causes the problems.

Don't believe me, though. Look at some of the references I have posted
- all written by EEs intimately familiar with the technology.
Post by Rob
The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that
into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date,
but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now
everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power
with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation.
That's fine for you. Personally, I don't expect it to get very far.
But it's not going to happen here.

Back in the 1800's, there was a current war. Nikola Tesla (supported by
George Westinghouse) proposed using AC. Thomas Edison proposed using
DC. Both had their advantages and disadvantages. AC won, obviously.
And now, it is so ingrained into our economy there is no chance of changing.

Although the utilities are building some long distance DC transmission
lines.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Rob
2014-11-29 15:41:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works
completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for
current, but that is another matter.
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
The first difference you are ignoring is your power supply is constant
voltage. A LED power supply is constant current. They work on entirely
different principles.
Constant voltage and constant current are not different principles.
Linear and switchmode are.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Sure they can be connected in series. But that has it's own problems;
you can only go so far. And yes, the LED gets a DC supply - but it's
the generation of the constant current source which causes the problems.
What problems?
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Don't believe me, though. Look at some of the references I have posted
- all written by EEs intimately familiar with the technology.
When someone points you at a manufacturer that gets things right you
question the truth...
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that
into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date,
but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now
everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power
with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation.
That's fine for you. Personally, I don't expect it to get very far.
But it's not going to happen here.
Of course not. You are living in the USA. There is no innovation
in the USA. I would never expect something to be changed.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Back in the 1800's, there was a current war. Nikola Tesla (supported by
George Westinghouse) proposed using AC. Thomas Edison proposed using
DC. Both had their advantages and disadvantages. AC won, obviously.
At that time, AC had more advantages. Now, DC has.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And now, it is so ingrained into our economy there is no chance of changing.
The economy here works a bit differently. When new systems have
advantages, they get deployed. Especially when they consume less energy.
You know, we have (only) digital TV here. For nearly 10 years no.
Something that will take years in the USA.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Although the utilities are building some long distance DC transmission
lines.
There you are!
A DC transmission line between here and Norway has been operating for
several years. Windenergy parks at sea are also feeding DC.
But at home it is even more of an advantage. E.g. to charge your
electrical car you want as much power as possible, and at DC the same
copper wire with the same insulation and safety concerns can transport
2-4 times more power.
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:53:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works
completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for
current, but that is another matter.
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work
completely differently.
The first difference you are ignoring is your power supply is constant
voltage. A LED power supply is constant current. They work on entirely
different principles.
Constant voltage and constant current are not different principles.
Linear and switchmode are.
No, they operate on entirely different principles.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Sure they can be connected in series. But that has it's own problems;
you can only go so far. And yes, the LED gets a DC supply - but it's
the generation of the constant current source which causes the problems.
What problems?
Please read back through my posts here. I'm not going to repeat myself.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Don't believe me, though. Look at some of the references I have posted
- all written by EEs intimately familiar with the technology.
When someone points you at a manufacturer that gets things right you
question the truth...
What did they get right? Physics doesn't change based on the manufacturer.

If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in
the U.S.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that
into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date,
but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now
everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power
with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation.
That's fine for you. Personally, I don't expect it to get very far.
But it's not going to happen here.
Of course not. You are living in the USA. There is no innovation
in the USA. I would never expect something to be changed.
Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a
hint: it wasn't Phillips.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Back in the 1800's, there was a current war. Nikola Tesla (supported by
George Westinghouse) proposed using AC. Thomas Edison proposed using
DC. Both had their advantages and disadvantages. AC won, obviously.
At that time, AC had more advantages. Now, DC has.
No, at the time neither had an advantage. You need to read up on the
"war" between Tesla and Edison.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
And now, it is so ingrained into our economy there is no chance of changing.
The economy here works a bit differently. When new systems have
advantages, they get deployed. Especially when they consume less energy.
You know, we have (only) digital TV here. For nearly 10 years no.
Something that will take years in the USA.
We have only digital TV here, also. Been that way for over 5 years.
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Although the utilities are building some long distance DC transmission
lines.
There you are!
A DC transmission line between here and Norway has been operating for
several years. Windenergy parks at sea are also feeding DC.
But at home it is even more of an advantage. E.g. to charge your
electrical car you want as much power as possible, and at DC the same
copper wire with the same insulation and safety concerns can transport
2-4 times more power.
We've had them for years, also. I don't know when they started, but
utilities are still building them. Probably have been for 20-30 years,
as semiconductors able to handle the power and voltage became available.

We also have a lot of wind turbines - both at see and on land.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 18:33:02 UTC
Permalink
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle <***@attglobal.net> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in
the U.S.
Yeah, they must be trolls.

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a
hint: it wasn't Phillips.
Hint:

The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 authorized the
Department of Energy (DOE) to establish the Bright Tomorrow Lighting
Prize competition, known as the "L Prize".

On 3 August 2011, DOE awarded the prize in the 60 W replacement category
to a Philips' LED lamp after 18 months of extensive testing.

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, at the time neither had an advantage. You need to read up on the
"war" between Tesla and Edison.
At the time there was no such thing as an effient DC-DC converter but
transformers did exist; that was a HUGE advantage.

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
We have only digital TV here, also. Been that way for over 5 years.
Nope, we still have legacy analog in many places and that was the
reason the FCC denied the petition to establish a 4M amateur band
in the US.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 01:21:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in
the U.S.
Yeah, they must be trolls.
You said it, not me.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a
hint: it wasn't Phillips.
The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 authorized the
Department of Energy (DOE) to establish the Bright Tomorrow Lighting
Prize competition, known as the "L Prize".
On 3 August 2011, DOE awarded the prize in the 60 W replacement category
to a Philips' LED lamp after 18 months of extensive testing.
Yes, but they did not develop the LED bulb. You obviously are not
reading, and arguing for argument's sake.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
No, at the time neither had an advantage. You need to read up on the
"war" between Tesla and Edison.
At the time there was no such thing as an effient DC-DC converter but
transformers did exist; that was a HUGE advantage.
Which had nothing to do with the war between Tesla and Edison. You
should read about the history before proving your ignorance.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
We have only digital TV here, also. Been that way for over 5 years.
Nope, we still have legacy analog in many places and that was the
reason the FCC denied the petition to establish a 4M amateur band
in the US.
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States. But those
frequencies ARE being used by digital TV stations - as the FCC said in
its denial of the petition.

Once again you prove your ignorance.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 03:22:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in
the U.S.
Yeah, they must be trolls.
You said it, not me.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a
hint: it wasn't Phillips.
The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 authorized the
Department of Energy (DOE) to establish the Bright Tomorrow Lighting
Prize competition, known as the "L Prize".
On 3 August 2011, DOE awarded the prize in the 60 W replacement category
to a Philips' LED lamp after 18 months of extensive testing.
Yes, but they did not develop the LED bulb. You obviously are not
reading, and arguing for argument's sake.
Neither inventing nor developing something is worth a lot unless you can
actually manufacture it. Witness the failure of the Wright Bros. airplane
company.

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States.
Tell that to the FCC who is allowing analog stations until Septempber,
2015.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 03:42:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in
the U.S.
Yeah, they must be trolls.
You said it, not me.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a
hint: it wasn't Phillips.
The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 authorized the
Department of Energy (DOE) to establish the Bright Tomorrow Lighting
Prize competition, known as the "L Prize".
On 3 August 2011, DOE awarded the prize in the 60 W replacement category
to a Philips' LED lamp after 18 months of extensive testing.
Yes, but they did not develop the LED bulb. You obviously are not
reading, and arguing for argument's sake.
Neither inventing nor developing something is worth a lot unless you can
actually manufacture it. Witness the failure of the Wright Bros. airplane
company.
Which is completely immaterial. The topic was development of LED light
bulbs. But you can't stay on topic, as usual.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States.
Tell that to the FCC who is allowing analog stations until Septempber,
2015.
A few low power stations, with range in the single digits of miles.
Hardly worth commenting on. Nothing worth commenting about, because the
number of people who can receive them is so low.

Effectively the entire country has converted to digital.

And it has nothing to do with the 70 meter band, as indicated in the
FCC's denial of the petition.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 06:02:21 UTC
Permalink
<snip
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States.
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
A few low power stations, with range in the single digits of miles.
So there is analog TV in the US.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 15:21:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States.
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
A few low power stations, with range in the single digits of miles.
So there is analog TV in the US.
There are a few special purpose stations with very limited coverage
which have been allowed to operate for a few more months. That does not
mean any of them are still operating, however.

But it does mean, for all intent purposes, that analog TV is gone. But
once again you show your stoopidity in not understanding that.

Can you name any stations which are still operating?

I didn't think so.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 18:28:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States.
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
A few low power stations, with range in the single digits of miles.
So there is analog TV in the US.
There are a few special purpose stations
So there is analog TV in the US.

That would seem to contridict your statement of "There is no analog TV
in the United States."

Can it be the Great and Mighty Jerry Stuckle, font of all knowledge,
keeper of all that is true, expert on everything, and seller of light
bulbs was, gasp!, wrong?

There is great rending of garments and wails of despair across the
land.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 19:54:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
<snip
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Nope. There is no analog TV in the United States.
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
A few low power stations, with range in the single digits of miles.
So there is analog TV in the US.
There are a few special purpose stations
So there is analog TV in the US.
That would seem to contridict your statement of "There is no analog TV
in the United States."
Can it be the Great and Mighty Jerry Stuckle, font of all knowledge,
keeper of all that is true, expert on everything, and seller of light
bulbs was, gasp!, wrong?
There is great rending of garments and wails of despair across the
land.
There is the AUTHORITY for them to continue for a few more months. Can
you name even ONE still broadcasting?

Of course, you can't. That's why you snipped my question from the last
post.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 18:20:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
According to independant reviews by people NOT selling light bulbs, some
manufacturers bulbs do.

The ones you are selling do not.

<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
The standards are being actively developed and have nothing to do with
altering the wiring voltage and everything to do with dimmer and bulb
technology.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 01:23:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
According to independant reviews by people NOT selling light bulbs, some
manufacturers bulbs do.
The ones you are selling do not.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.

Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
The standards are being actively developed and have nothing to do with
altering the wiring voltage and everything to do with dimmer and bulb
technology.
And exactly who is "developing" these standards? References?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 03:25:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
According to independant reviews by people NOT selling light bulbs, some
manufacturers bulbs do.
The ones you are selling do not.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
Yep, anyone that disagrees with you is untrained and anywhere it is published
something that disagrees with you is funny papers.
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
The standards are being actively developed and have nothing to do with
altering the wiring voltage and everything to do with dimmer and bulb
technology.
And exactly who is "developing" these standards? References?
I thought you were supposed to be an expert in light bulbs?

If you actually knew anything about such you would know what the
standards groups are.
--
Jim Pennino
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-30 03:44:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably
with triac dimmer controls.
According to independant reviews by people NOT selling light bulbs, some
manufacturers bulbs do.
The ones you are selling do not.
Independent reviews by untrained people are worth exactly what you paid
for them.
Keep reading the funny pages. They're your speed.
Yep, anyone that disagrees with you is untrained and anywhere it is published
something that disagrees with you is funny papers.
And what are the qualifications of the guy who wrote the blog? A
"text-based adventure connoisseur"? Some qualifications! Where's his
engineering degree? His experience in test labs?

Keep reading the funny pages, Jimmy. They're right up your alley.
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
<snip>
Post by Jerry Stuckle
It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for
the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V
wiring.
The standards are being actively developed and have nothing to do with
altering the wiring voltage and everything to do with dimmer and bulb
technology.
And exactly who is "developing" these standards? References?
I thought you were supposed to be an expert in light bulbs?
If you actually knew anything about such you would know what the
standards groups are.
No, I'm asking YOU - exactly who is "developing" these standards?
References? IOW, support your claim.

But you can't, because once again you have no idea what you're talking
about.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-29 18:16:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob
Post by Jerry Stuckle
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case,
why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not?
"is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination
with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power.
This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics
in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent
on the mains voltage, and now you are cutting down the mains power.
(not even the voltage, really)
Yes, the RMS voltage, really.

If you remove part of a cycle from a sine wave, the RMS voltage goes
down. The RMS voltage depends on the waveform.
Post by Rob
You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack.
Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in
front of it?
No, not really. When you turn down the dimmer, the supply will first
try all it can do to keep the voltage at 13.8, and at some point it can
not achieve that anymore and the voltage will drop, but it will not
be stabilized anymore.
Similarly, a LED bulb may keep constant light emission for a large part
of the dimmer setpoint range, and at some point it goes down in intensity
in an erratic way.
We are just in the first phase of LED lighting deployment, the
"compatability" phase where the bulbs are still using existing form
factors of incandescent bulbs, and are supplied with mains voltage
that is converted to current inside the bulb. It is not the best
solution to use such bulbs in combination with existing dimmers.
Of course a next phase will be to use more reasonable form factors and
connection, where the electronics have a light level setpoint that
determines the LED current and the mains voltage is directly applied
without intermediate phase-cut dimmer.
People like dimmers and the huge installed base of legacy dimmers
ensures they will be around for decades.

The various standards groups, such as NEMA, are actively working on
standards for the new lighting technologies and as the issue is global
and involves billions of dollars of product, will likely eventually
result in a set of standards for bulbs for legacy dimmers and standards
for new technologies.
--
Jim Pennino
Michael Black
2014-11-29 05:28:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
That may be semantics. LEDs are current driven, voltage won't have much
effect other than when fed through a resistor that does convert to
current.

More likely the LEDs would be driven with a square wave, and changing the
ratio of on to off would vary the light output of the LED.

Michael
Jerry Stuckle
2014-11-29 15:06:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Black
Post by Jerry Stuckle
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
Given that manufacturers want the least cost in a product, and the
regulator in a light bulb would have no need for a variable regulator,
and that these things are made in the millions, it would be extremely
silly to assume that the regulator is anything other than a fixed
regulator for LED's and is designed to handle the load of some fixed
number of LED's.
Once again, incorrect. Have you ever heard of "dimmable LED bulbs"?
How do you dim without an adjustable regulator?
That may be semantics. LEDs are current driven, voltage won't have much
effect other than when fed through a resistor that does convert to current.
I never claimed it was a voltage regulator. You can have adjustable
current regulators, also.
Post by Michael Black
More likely the LEDs would be driven with a square wave, and changing
the ratio of on to off would vary the light output of the LED.
Michael
That's one of doing it, but not the only way. It probably is the most
efficient way, though. And it does solve some other problems.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
***@attglobal.net
==================
Barry OGrady
2014-11-28 21:56:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
Of course, one can run tubes on low voltage. The Collins 75S receiver
line apparently kept plat voltage relatively low (somewhere around 120v if
I remember right) which had certain advantages. One can run regular tubes
at 12VDC on the plate, there were some articles in Popular Electronics
about this, calling them "starved circuits". Or there were those tubes
designed to run off 12VDC for those hybrid car radios, a last gasp before
transistors took over completely.
I had a hybrid car radio with four valves and two transistors.
The RF amp, mixer, IF amp, and first audio used valves.
Those valves had 12 volts on the plate.

I also had a valve test oscillator that ran off a 9 volt grid bias
battery.
Post by Michael Black
Though, 3VDC does seem a tad low.
Michael
--
Judge John E. Jones wrote:
To be sure, DarwinÂ’s theory of evolution is imperfect. However,
the fact that a scientific theory cannot yet render an explanation
on every point should not be used as a pretext to thrust an
untestable alternative hypothesis grounded in religion into
the science classroom or to misrepresent well-established
scientific propositions.

When faith comes in logic goes out
Michael Black
2014-11-29 05:32:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Barry OGrady
Post by Michael Black
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
As the regulators are potted in and would be difficult to remove, and
since LED's run on voltages on the order of 2-3 volts, no.
How many 3 volt valves can you name?
I think that point was that if a regulator was used to drop the line
voltage to those 3volts, it could handle high voltage input. The probably
false assumption is that the regulator would be variable from some very
high output voltage to some very low output voltage, so one could use it
for tubes by making that adjustment.
A lot of IC regulators can't handle high voltage. If nothing else, nobody
saw the need, it was the solid state age. So dissipation issues aside,
most regulators expect at most a relatively low DC voltage input.
Of course, one can run tubes on low voltage. The Collins 75S receiver
line apparently kept plat voltage relatively low (somewhere around 120v if
I remember right) which had certain advantages. One can run regular tubes
at 12VDC on the plate, there were some articles in Popular Electronics
about this, calling them "starved circuits". Or there were those tubes
designed to run off 12VDC for those hybrid car radios, a last gasp before
transistors took over completely.
I had a hybrid car radio with four valves and two transistors.
The RF amp, mixer, IF amp, and first audio used valves.
Those valves had 12 volts on the plate.
I assumed all the audio would be transitorized. But it was right at that
point where transistors might not have yet been so good at higher
frequencies, so tubes handled the radio part of the radio.

Motorola had a hybrid "lunchbox" type transceiver. A diode mixer in the
receiver, if I'm remembering right, the local oscillator chain was
subminiature tubes, as well as the first IF, then a 455KHz transistorized
IF strip and solid state audio. They had to keep the tubes because the
transistors weren't good enough for VHF.
Post by Barry OGrady
I also had a valve test oscillator that ran off a 9 volt grid bias
battery.
Yes, that sort of thing would have been quite handy.

Michael
Katz Ajamas
2014-11-29 04:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
There is not a whole lot in there.
AC/DC supply, Buck/Boost controller chip with triac dimmer sensing (if it's a dimmable LED lamp), small inductors caps, rectifiers.

TI and ONSemi have controllers and reference designs at their web sites.
I don't know if the govt regulators are requiring any sort of power factor correction.

There is a whole lot of power factor correction circuitry going into higher current consumer goods in the EU so there should be good parts(inductors rectifiers, switches, caps) in a few years when consumers begin yearning for newer models.
gareth
2014-11-29 09:07:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by gareth
These LED replacements for 240V mains lamps; if one were to
open them, would one find a high voltage regulator suitable for
some of our valve experiments and repairs?
Apologies to all. I had thought that this might be an interesting area to
investigate. I did not mean for it to be a vehicle for the two infantile
Yank rednecks to vent their spleens (again)
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2014-11-30 00:29:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by gareth
Apologies to all. I had thought that this might be an interesting area to
investigate. I did not mean for it to be a vehicle for the two infantile
Yank rednecks to vent their spleens (again)
Thus speaketh Colonel Blimp, the pikey, bloviating, gas bag.
--
Jim Pennino
Loading...