Discussion:
Geloso G.222 TR help
(too old to reply)
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-17 16:45:26 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,

I'm repairing an old Geloso G.222 TR transmitter for a friend (this is the
first version, I understand there were two issues from the schematics I've
found on the net).

First of all, this set has been modified with two relays for transmit/receive
antenna changeover and HV switching. I don't know if this mod was common back
in the days or not.
Repair so far consisted in using silicon rectifiers in place of original
selenium bridges (all were leaky), changing almost all electrolytics (almost
all were too leaky and couldn't be reformed, so I also changed the only two
ones that seemed to start reforming with voltage applied). I replaced all
resistors that had drifted more than 20% in value and replaced the resistor
inside the 6164's plate suppressor (original 33 ohm resistor was broken,
replace with 47 ohm 2W carbon composition as I didn't happen to have
a suitable 33 ohm one), finally replaced the 6146 final tube that was dead
(getter was white despite no apparent external damage in the glass envelope).
Replacement was a NOS W8289.

First thing I noticed (my usual experience with tube finals are more modern
Yaesu and Kenwood hybdrids) is that the 6146 has no bias setting point, so
I'm a bit puzzled about how it is supposed to work without burning.

I found in the technical bullettin n.83 the schematic and alignment
instructions. The first thing I noticed is the G1 of 6146 is supposed
to be at -85V in CW tx. How is that possible since the only negative
supply in this transmitter is -50V? I infact measured -50V when in CW mode,
but I didn't key the transmitter as the 8289 died before I could try.

When I started the first TX experiments, I tried on 80m band AM mode, with
50 ohm 500W bird dummy load connected at the antenna socket. I could obtain
50W out with plate capacitor around middle position and loading capacitor
fully meshed. That was with no modulation, carrier only, so far so good.
I tried on 40m band and power was much less, and 8289 started to show signs
of red spots on the plate. On the higher bands, problem much worse, almost no
power and 8289 plate glowing soon after going into TX, no tuning of the plate
capacitor seemed to help.
These tests, even if short, killed the 8289 which cracked the glass under the
plate cap... I think it was a marginal tube, because I didn't allow the tube
to remain in TX as soon as the plate was starting to glow red.

Relay contacts were cleaned and contact resistance checked before the tests.
The Pi coil is rather oxidized (it is not silver plated, so copper oxide grew
on it), I tried to clean it the best I could. Is there any way to test if
the coil is still good enough?

Grid bias of the 6146 in AM mode appear to be 0V + vfo driver (about 100V pp),
is this correct? As I said, I've never seen a 6146 with no negative grid bias
anywhere else. Grid bias in CW mode is -50V but I never tried keying as
the 8289 was already dead when I was checking this.
Now I'm shopping for another 6146, can the 6146B work in this transmitters?
I have several used 6146B as they're common in Yaesu and Kenwood transmitters,
but no plain 6146 or 6146A.

Any other hint is welcome! I'd like to hear from G.222 experts if any :-)

Best 73 and season greetings

Frank IZ8DWF
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-17 16:50:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Replacement was a NOS W8289.
of course it is W8298 (non A).

Frank IZ8DWF
nierveze
2012-12-17 20:09:44 UTC
Permalink
hello
I also have a g222 tr first generation ,that has no problem for now...(I
touch my wooden head!!)
It seems that you have an excessive dissipation of your 6146.
What is the current of plate?
Check the vfo,does if give enought power,does the small variable condenser
at its output work?
Do you have enought excitation on the grid?
What is the voltage of the G2 of the 6146?
On the first version of the transmitter it is provided by a small separate
transformer and power supply,this small power supply is used for the vfo
,the two first tubes on the modulator and the G2 of the 6146 .Also change
this rectifier (tubular one,black) I did the same modifications than you
:replaced chimical condensers and rectifiers,for the rectifiers I used small
'bridges 'with 1N4007.
I am not a specialist of those machines...it is just the first tx I knew 45
years ago at my grand father's station...
it is just some ideas.
Also a way to save your pa tubes until you find the problem would be to
decrease the hv ,so decrease the plate dissipation ,I have used a variac to
underpower the transformer,not standard but it helped me.
73 F1GQB
It is my turn to ask a question ,I also have a geloso g209 receiver that has
some problems:from times to times one of two second lo stops (the one used
on am,and usb,the one used in lsb works),it seems a thermal problem,I used
antioxidation produtcs,I reshaped the contacts,I resoldered everything,It
continues,
what can it be????
--
Alain Nierveze
www.radio-astronomie.com
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Hi all,
I'm repairing an old Geloso G.222 TR transmitter for a friend (this is the
first version, I understand there were two issues from the schematics I've
found on the net).
First of all, this set has been modified with two relays for
transmit/receive
antenna changeover and HV switching. I don't know if this mod was common back
in the days or not.
Repair so far consisted in using silicon rectifiers in place of original
selenium bridges (all were leaky), changing almost all electrolytics (almost
all were too leaky and couldn't be reformed, so I also changed the only two
ones that seemed to start reforming with voltage applied). I replaced all
resistors that had drifted more than 20% in value and replaced the resistor
inside the 6164's plate suppressor (original 33 ohm resistor was broken,
replace with 47 ohm 2W carbon composition as I didn't happen to have
a suitable 33 ohm one), finally replaced the 6146 final tube that was dead
(getter was white despite no apparent external damage in the glass envelope).
Replacement was a NOS W8289.
First thing I noticed (my usual experience with tube finals are more modern
Yaesu and Kenwood hybdrids) is that the 6146 has no bias setting point, so
I'm a bit puzzled about how it is supposed to work without burning.
I found in the technical bullettin n.83 the schematic and alignment
instructions. The first thing I noticed is the G1 of 6146 is supposed
to be at -85V in CW tx. How is that possible since the only negative
supply in this transmitter is -50V? I infact measured -50V when in CW mode,
but I didn't key the transmitter as the 8289 died before I could try.
When I started the first TX experiments, I tried on 80m band AM mode, with
50 ohm 500W bird dummy load connected at the antenna socket. I could obtain
50W out with plate capacitor around middle position and loading capacitor
fully meshed. That was with no modulation, carrier only, so far so good.
I tried on 40m band and power was much less, and 8289 started to show signs
of red spots on the plate. On the higher bands, problem much worse, almost no
power and 8289 plate glowing soon after going into TX, no tuning of the plate
capacitor seemed to help.
These tests, even if short, killed the 8289 which cracked the glass under the
plate cap... I think it was a marginal tube, because I didn't allow the tube
to remain in TX as soon as the plate was starting to glow red.
Relay contacts were cleaned and contact resistance checked before the tests.
The Pi coil is rather oxidized (it is not silver plated, so copper oxide grew
on it), I tried to clean it the best I could. Is there any way to test if
the coil is still good enough?
Grid bias of the 6146 in AM mode appear to be 0V + vfo driver (about 100V pp),
is this correct? As I said, I've never seen a 6146 with no negative grid bias
anywhere else. Grid bias in CW mode is -50V but I never tried keying as
the 8289 was already dead when I was checking this.
Now I'm shopping for another 6146, can the 6146B work in this
transmitters?
I have several used 6146B as they're common in Yaesu and Kenwood transmitters,
but no plain 6146 or 6146A.
Any other hint is welcome! I'd like to hear from G.222 experts if any :-)
Best 73 and season greetings
Frank IZ8DWF
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-17 21:13:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by nierveze
hello
I also have a g222 tr first generation ,that has no problem for now...(I
touch my wooden head!!)
It seems that you have an excessive dissipation of your 6146.
What is the current of plate?
unfortunately I didn't pay attention to the value as I was paying attention
on the plate colour and other sign of problem, like smoke somewhere. It was
on the very first TX tests and the final tube lasted too short a time.
Post by nierveze
Check the vfo,does if give enought power,does the small variable condenser
at its output work?
yes the driver tuning condenser work, but what's "enough" output?
I can measure the RF voltage at the grid of the 6146 but how can I tell
what is supposed to be the right drive voltage?
Post by nierveze
Do you have enought excitation on the grid?
on the service information I haven't seen any indication on what's enough
excitation voltage. I'll try to realign the VFO again for maximum output on
all bands
Post by nierveze
What is the voltage of the G2 of the 6146?
it's 210V at no load
Can you check what DC voltage you have on the 6146 G1 when TX in AM mode?
Can you confirm G1 bias is -50V in CW mode?
Post by nierveze
On the first version of the transmitter it is provided by a small separate
transformer and power supply,this small power supply is used for the vfo
,the two first tubes on the modulator and the G2 of the 6146 .Also change
this rectifier (tubular one,black) I did the same modifications than you
replaced chimical condensers and rectifiers,for the rectifiers I used small
'bridges 'with 1N4007.
yes, I also used 1N4007.
Post by nierveze
I am not a specialist of those machines...it is just the first tx I knew 45
years ago at my grand father's station...
it is just some ideas.
Also a way to save your pa tubes until you find the problem would be to
decrease the hv ,so decrease the plate dissipation ,I have used a variac to
underpower the transformer,not standard but it helped me.
well yes, good suggestion. I didn't expect the tube to die so quickly. I
once repaired an old Yaesu FT-101E that had a failure in the 6JS6C grid bias
circuit and basicly it had no negative bias on control grid, so as soon as the
heather was switched on, the tubes would start drawing a large amount of
current and the plates were glowing bright red. I of course switched off
the set as soon as I saw the plates glowing but I think the owner didn't
realize wath was going on since most of the wires around the power transformer
were carbonized. It's amazing that the power transformer itself survived
and what was amazing too is that those tubes still were putting 50-60% of
their rated output power after the problem was fixed and many wires were
changed.
Post by nierveze
73 F1GQB
It is my turn to ask a question ,I also have a geloso g209 receiver that has
some problems:from times to times one of two second lo stops (the one used
on am,and usb,the one used in lsb works),it seems a thermal problem,I used
antioxidation produtcs,I reshaped the contacts,I resoldered everything,It
continues,
what can it be????
if it has two separate xtals for USB and LSB, check the xtal socket and
the tuning of the oscillator. Try gently moving the USB xtal and see if
RX come back again.

Thanks and 73
Frank IZ8DWF
nierveze
2012-12-17 22:01:56 UTC
Permalink
hello again Frank,
as there is no indication in the documentation of what is the normal output
power of the vfo,maybe it would be useful to use new 6cl6 and 5763,also an
indication of grid excitation is useful,on my set the excitation
potentiometer is about 1/4 turn to get the 3.5 ma required on 80M
with the driver tuning condenser correctly tuned,this can be checked in
RECEIVE position of the transmit/receive switch(but this has maybe been
modified in your set
) AND the am/vfo-beat/cw switch in vfo-beat:this powers up only the vfo,not
the
pa ,this is used to tune the tx to the rx frequency(heterodyne).In this
condition you can get an indication of the excitation,without using the
pa,you should not have hv
so no risk for the pa tube,but I am just wondering
what are exactly the modifications don on your tx...
-why not try to put it back in its original condition by removing all those
relays
Hope this helps
73 alain F1gqb
thanks for your suggestions for the rx,I already dit it :-(((
--
Alain Nierveze
www.radio-astronomie.com
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Post by nierveze
hello
I also have a g222 tr first generation ,that has no problem for now...(I
touch my wooden head!!)
It seems that you have an excessive dissipation of your 6146.
What is the current of plate?
unfortunately I didn't pay attention to the value as I was paying attention
on the plate colour and other sign of problem, like smoke somewhere. It was
on the very first TX tests and the final tube lasted too short a time.
Post by nierveze
Check the vfo,does if give enought power,does the small variable condenser
at its output work?
yes the driver tuning condenser work, but what's "enough" output?
I can measure the RF voltage at the grid of the 6146 but how can I tell
what is supposed to be the right drive voltage?
Post by nierveze
Do you have enought excitation on the grid?
on the service information I haven't seen any indication on what's enough
excitation voltage. I'll try to realign the VFO again for maximum output on
all bands
Post by nierveze
What is the voltage of the G2 of the 6146?
it's 210V at no load
Can you check what DC voltage you have on the 6146 G1 when TX in AM mode?
Can you confirm G1 bias is -50V in CW mode?
Post by nierveze
On the first version of the transmitter it is provided by a small separate
transformer and power supply,this small power supply is used for the vfo
,the two first tubes on the modulator and the G2 of the 6146 .Also change
this rectifier (tubular one,black) I did the same modifications than you
replaced chimical condensers and rectifiers,for the rectifiers I used small
'bridges 'with 1N4007.
yes, I also used 1N4007.
Post by nierveze
I am not a specialist of those machines...it is just the first tx I knew 45
years ago at my grand father's station...
it is just some ideas.
Also a way to save your pa tubes until you find the problem would be to
decrease the hv ,so decrease the plate dissipation ,I have used a variac to
underpower the transformer,not standard but it helped me.
well yes, good suggestion. I didn't expect the tube to die so quickly. I
once repaired an old Yaesu FT-101E that had a failure in the 6JS6C grid bias
circuit and basicly it had no negative bias on control grid, so as soon as the
heather was switched on, the tubes would start drawing a large amount of
current and the plates were glowing bright red. I of course switched off
the set as soon as I saw the plates glowing but I think the owner didn't
realize wath was going on since most of the wires around the power transformer
were carbonized. It's amazing that the power transformer itself survived
and what was amazing too is that those tubes still were putting 50-60% of
their rated output power after the problem was fixed and many wires were
changed.
Post by nierveze
73 F1GQB
It is my turn to ask a question ,I also have a geloso g209 receiver that has
some problems:from times to times one of two second lo stops (the one used
on am,and usb,the one used in lsb works),it seems a thermal problem,I used
antioxidation produtcs,I reshaped the contacts,I resoldered everything,It
continues,
what can it be????
if it has two separate xtals for USB and LSB, check the xtal socket and
the tuning of the oscillator. Try gently moving the USB xtal and see if
RX come back again.
Thanks and 73
Frank IZ8DWF
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-18 09:50:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by nierveze
hello again Frank,
as there is no indication in the documentation of what is the normal output
power of the vfo,maybe it would be useful to use new 6cl6 and 5763,also an
indication of grid excitation is useful,on my set the excitation
potentiometer is about 1/4 turn to get the 3.5 ma required on 80M
with the driver tuning condenser correctly tuned,this can be checked in
RECEIVE position of the transmit/receive switch(but this has maybe been
modified in your set
I see I have VFO output when the switch is on the VFO-BEAT position but the
output to the grid of the 6146 is smaller than that I can measure in AM
position. I need to check from the schematic if this is correct.
Post by nierveze
) AND the am/vfo-beat/cw switch in vfo-beat:this powers up only the vfo,not
the
pa ,this is used to tune the tx to the rx frequency(heterodyne).In this
condition you can get an indication of the excitation,without using the
pa,you should not have hv
so no risk for the pa tube,but I am just wondering
what are exactly the modifications don on your tx...
-why not try to put it back in its original condition by removing all those
relays
this isn't possible, the original T/R switch is missing, at its place there is
an on/off switch that just energize the two added relays. The DC for the
relays has been obtained with a doubling rectifier on the 6.3V AC heather
supply.
Post by nierveze
Hope this helps
73 alain F1gqb
thanks for your suggestions for the rx,I already dit it :-(((
Thanks
Frank IZ8DWF
Edmund H. Ramm
2012-12-17 22:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
I'm repairing an old Geloso G.222 TR transmitter for a friend
[...]
Repair so far consisted in using silicon rectifiers in place of original
selenium bridges (all were leaky),
Silicon rectifiers exhibit a lesser voltage drop across them. All
DC voltages will be higher aftr your modification.
Post by f***@notvalid.it
[...]
First thing I noticed (my usual experience with tube finals are more modern
Yaesu and Kenwood hybdrids) is that the 6146 has no bias setting point, so
I'm a bit puzzled about how it is supposed to work without burning.
I found in the technical bullettin n.83 the schematic and alignment
instructions. The first thing I noticed is the G1 of 6146 is supposed
to be at -85V in CW tx. How is that possible since the only negative
supply in this transmitter is -50V? I infact measured -50V when in CW mode,
but I didn't key the transmitter as the 8289 died before I could try.
Those -50V you measured are the protective bias. When excited, the
resulting grid current will add to the protective bias.
Post by f***@notvalid.it
[...]
73, Eddi ._._.
--
e-mail: dj6ux AT arrl DOT net | AMPRNET: ***@db0hht.ampr.org
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-18 07:47:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Post by f***@notvalid.it
I found in the technical bullettin n.83 the schematic and alignment
instructions. The first thing I noticed is the G1 of 6146 is supposed
to be at -85V in CW tx. How is that possible since the only negative
supply in this transmitter is -50V? I infact measured -50V when in CW mode,
but I didn't key the transmitter as the 8289 died before I could try.
Those -50V you measured are the protective bias. When excited, the
resulting grid current will add to the protective bias.
ah that's why... It's working in C class with G1 current! I would never
expect an AM TX final amplifier to work in something else than A or B class.
Thanks for the hint. Do you know if this protective bias should be present
also when the G.222 is operated in AM position?

Tnx,
73 Frank IZ8DWF
Edmund H. Ramm
2012-12-19 00:07:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Post by f***@notvalid.it
I found in the technical bullettin n.83 the schematic and alignment
instructions. The first thing I noticed is the G1 of 6146 is supposed
to be at -85V in CW tx. How is that possible since the only negative
supply in this transmitter is -50V? I infact measured -50V when in CW mode,
but I didn't key the transmitter as the 8289 died before I could try.
Those -50V you measured are the protective bias. When excited, the
resulting grid current will add to the protective bias.
ah that's why... It's working in C class with G1 current! I would never
expect an AM TX final amplifier to work in something else than A or B class.
Why, it doesn't need to be linear, unlike concepts where modulation is
applied at some earlier stage.
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Thanks for the hint. Do you know if this protective bias should be present
also when the G.222 is operated in AM position?
Not off hand, would need to dig out the circuit diagram. It's ages
since I layed hands on a G.222TR. And I operate CW only. Maybe I'm
missing something when I see no advantage in using no protective bias
in AM mode.

73, Eddi ._._.
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-19 08:10:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Those -50V you measured are the protective bias. When excited, the
resulting grid current will add to the protective bias.
ah that's why... It's working in C class with G1 current! I would never
expect an AM TX final amplifier to work in something else than A or B class.
Why, it doesn't need to be linear, unlike concepts where modulation is
applied at some earlier stage.
indeed this is correct, the modulation is applied to the final amplifier,
so it can work in class C, thanks again for explaining.
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Post by f***@notvalid.it
Thanks for the hint. Do you know if this protective bias should be present
also when the G.222 is operated in AM position?
Not off hand, would need to dig out the circuit diagram. It's ages
since I layed hands on a G.222TR. And I operate CW only. Maybe I'm
missing something when I see no advantage in using no protective bias
in AM mode.
here you can find the schematic:

Loading Image...

Probably since in AM mode there's always present the VFO drive, they thought
it would be enough to just trim the drive voltage while monitoring the grid
current to remain in the safe range. If this isn't the case, there must be
a bad contact in the mode switch because indeed in AM mode I don't measure
any protective bias on 6146's G1.

Do you see any reason not to use a 6146B as final tube? I have a few of these
but no 6146/6146A left.


Thanks again and 73
Frank IZ8DWF
Edmund H. Ramm
2012-12-19 15:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
[...]
Do you see any reason not to use a 6146B as final tube? I have a few of
these but no 6146/6146A left.
Yes, different internal capacitances for one. Might be difficult
to neutralise, plus other "interesting" effects. 6146W turn up on
ebay from time to time. But there was a caveat concerning the "W"-
suffixed 6146s. IIRC they are either 6146A or B equivalents, depending
on the date of manufacture.

And sorry, I'm busy, no time so far to consult the circuit diagram.

73, Eddi ._._.
--
e-mail: dj6ux AT arrl DOT net | AMPRNET: ***@db0hht.ampr.org
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!
Edmund H. Ramm
2012-12-20 17:48:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
[...]
Thanks for the hint. Do you know if this protective bias should be present
also when the G.222 is operated in AM position?
[...]
Lots of "ifs": If the mode switch shown in the diagram only has
the three positions AM - VFO Beat - CW, and if the switch's position
shown in the diagram is the AM position, then there is no protective
bias in AM mode, indeed.

Do you know this urge to wring the designer's neck until he discloses
what drugs he was on when he designed this circuit?

Other transmitters use at least a kind of brute force circuit to pull
down the PA valve's screen grid voltage with no exitation present, in
order to keep the anode dissipation low enough.

73, Eddi ._._.
f***@notvalid.it
2012-12-21 08:35:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Lots of "ifs": If the mode switch shown in the diagram only has
the three positions AM - VFO Beat - CW, and if the switch's position
shown in the diagram is the AM position, then there is no protective
bias in AM mode, indeed.
ok, that's what it seems to me too (the circuit drawing isn't also very
easy to follow sometimes), and that's what I can measure on the real
thing.
Post by Edmund H. Ramm
Do you know this urge to wring the designer's neck until he discloses
what drugs he was on when he designed this circuit?
Other transmitters use at least a kind of brute force circuit to pull
down the PA valve's screen grid voltage with no exitation present, in
order to keep the anode dissipation low enough.
I agree, if you don't monitor the G1 current in AM mode, the 6146 will
not survive for long time.

By the way, I ordered a new 6146, the PA has no neutralization circuit so
probably even the 6146B would work fine, but none of my used 6146B is in a
known state, so I would just add other unknowns if I'd try with them.

73
Frank IZ8DWF
Edmund H. Ramm
2012-12-26 17:52:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
[...]
By the way, I ordered a new 6146, the PA has no neutralization circuit so
probably even the 6146B would work fine, but none of my used 6146B is in a
known state, so I would just add other unknowns if I'd try with them.
Meanwhile I dug out the information I knew I had hidden someplace
I wouldn't find soon:

----
How to tell whether you need a 6146/6146A or 6146B
(courtesy of K9STH and muchstuff.com/6146.htm)

6293 is a heavy duty type 6146 has a much heavier plate, and will outlast a
6146 five to ten times.

8298 is same as 6146A

6146A/8298 has a different heater than 6146 and can stand slightly more
variations in heater voltage. Direct sub for 6146. Rated at 90 watts input
as is the 6146.

8298A is same as 6146B

6146B/8298A is not a direct sub for 6146 or 6146A. Rated at 120 watts
input. It requires different neutralizing, and over time the neutralizing
may change and become impossible. May try a sub but watch carefully for a
long time. If it does not neutralize pull it.

6146 or 6146A/8298 or 6293 will sub for 6146B; but not usually visa versa.
The use of a 6146 or 6146A/8298 or 6293 must be below 90 watts CW, 85 watts
SSB & 67.5 watts AM.

6146W may be either a 6146/6146A or a 6146B. Depends upon the date. If
before 1964 a 6146W/7212 is a 6146A/8298. If after 1964 a 6146W/7212A is a
6146B/8298A. Can be either if dated 1964.

Summation:

In preferential order for 6146 type, unless the gear is designed for 6146B:

6293 as first choice, then

8298/6146A or 6146W/7212 dated prior to 1964, then

6146 as last choice..

In preferential order if gear is designed for 6146B:

8298A/6146B or 6146W dated after 1964, then

the above 6146 group may be used with the limitations as last
choice.

******************12.6 Volt filaments ************

6883/6883A is 12v 6146/6146A

8032 is commercial and same as 6883A.

6883B/8032A/8552 is 12v 6146B

6883B same as 8032A same as 8552.
----

73, HTH es hny 2013, Eddi ._._.
--
e-mail: dj6ux AT arrl DOT net | AMPRNET: ***@db0hht.ampr.org
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!
Edmund H. Ramm
2012-12-26 17:52:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@notvalid.it
[...]
By the way, I ordered a new 6146, the PA has no neutralization circuit so
probably even the 6146B would work fine, but none of my used 6146B is in a
known state, so I would just add other unknowns if I'd try with them.
Meanwhile I dug out the information I knew I had hidden someplace
I wouldn't find soon:

----
How to tell whether you need a 6146/6146A or 6146B
(courtesy of K9STH and muchstuff.com/6146.htm)

6293 is a heavy duty type 6146 has a much heavier plate, and will outlast a
6146 five to ten times.

8298 is same as 6146A

6146A/8298 has a different heater than 6146 and can stand slightly more
variations in heater voltage. Direct sub for 6146. Rated at 90 watts input
as is the 6146.

8298A is same as 6146B

6146B/8298A is not a direct sub for 6146 or 6146A. Rated at 120 watts
input. It requires different neutralizing, and over time the neutralizing
may change and become impossible. May try a sub but watch carefully for a
long time. If it does not neutralize pull it.

6146 or 6146A/8298 or 6293 will sub for 6146B; but not usually visa versa.
The use of a 6146 or 6146A/8298 or 6293 must be below 90 watts CW, 85 watts
SSB & 67.5 watts AM.

6146W may be either a 6146/6146A or a 6146B. Depends upon the date. If
before 1964 a 6146W/7212 is a 6146A/8298. If after 1964 a 6146W/7212A is a
6146B/8298A. Can be either if dated 1964.

Summation:

In preferential order for 6146 type, unless the gear is designed for 6146B:

6293 as first choice, then

8298/6146A or 6146W/7212 dated prior to 1964, then

6146 as last choice..

In preferential order if gear is designed for 6146B:

8298A/6146B or 6146W dated after 1964, then

the above 6146 group may be used with the limitations as last
choice.

******************12.6 Volt filaments ************

6883/6883A is 12v 6146/6146A

8032 is commercial and same as 6883A.

6883B/8032A/8552 is 12v 6146B

6883B same as 8032A same as 8552.
----

73, HTH es hny 2013, Eddi ._._.
--
e-mail: dj6ux AT arrl DOT net | AMPRNET: ***@db0hht.ampr.org
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!
Loading...